Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Honda CR-V vs Nissan X-Trail T32: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Honda CR-V

Honda · 2016–2022

CR-V

Power
88 kW120 PS
0–100 km/h
-
Top speed
-
Kerb mass
-

Photo: EurovisionNim / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Nissan X-Trail T32

Nissan · 2013–2022

X-Trail T32

C PI 443

Power
116 kW158 PS
0–100 km/h
11.5 s
Top speed
198 km/h
Kerb mass
1,557 kg

Version spec sheet All generations

Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

  • City CR-V Length: 4,584 mm vs 4,690 mm

In plain words

Nissan X-Trail T32 has more power: 116 kW (158 PS) against 88 kW (120 PS) for Honda CR-V. Nissan X-Trail T32 is 106 mm longer than Honda CR-V (4,690 mm vs 4,584 mm). Nissan X-Trail T32 is the older design (from 2013); Honda CR-V arrived in 2016. On the catalog figures, the Honda CR-V is the pick for city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Honda CR-V yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

CR-V · X-Trail T32
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,660 mmWheelbase 8 ft 9 inLength 4,584 mmLength 15 ft 0 in1,657 mm5 ft 5 inWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,690 mmLength 15 ft 5 in1,710 mm5 ft 7 in
CR-VX-Trail T32
Length 4,584 mm180.5 in 4,690 mm184.6 in +106 mm +4.2 in +2.3%
Width 1,855 mm73.0 in 1,820 mm71.7 in −35 mm −1.4 in −1.9%
Height 1,657 mm65.2 in 1,710 mm67.3 in +53 mm +2.1 in +3.2%
Wheelbase 2,660 mm104.7 in 2,705 mm106.5 in +45 mm +1.8 in +1.7%
Fits a standard garage? TightYes

Difference vs CR-V (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

Honda CR-VNissan X-Trail T32
General
Version 1.6 · 88 kW (120 PS) 1.3 DIG-T (158 PS) DCT · petrol · 116 kW (158 PS)
Production years 2016–2022 2013–2022
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country Japan Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 88 kW (120 PS) 118 hp 116 kW (158 PS) 156 hp Better
Power, all versions 88–142 kW (120–193 PS) 118–190 hp 96–130 kW (131–177 PS) 129–174 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. No data 270 Nm 199 lb-ft
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. No data 11.5 s
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. No data 198 km/h 123 mph
Power per tonne No data 75 kW/t 91 hp/ton calculated
Engine and transmission
Fuel No data Petrol
Engine 1,600 cc 1.6 l 1,332 cc · 4 cyl 1.3 l
Engine code No data HR13
Gearbox No data 7-speed dual-clutch
Drive No data Front-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,584 mm 180.5 in 4,690 mm 184.6 in
Width 1,855 mm 73.0 in 1,820 mm 71.7 in
Height 1,657 mm 65.2 in 1,710 mm 67.3 in
Wheelbase 2,660 mm 104.7 in 2,705 mm 106.5 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. No data 1,557 kg 3,433 lb
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. No data 565 l 20.0 cu ft
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. No data 60 l 15.9 gal US
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. No data 6.4 l/100 km 36.8 mpg US
CO₂ No data 145 g/km
Fuel cost per year No data €1,680/year estimated
Range on a full tank No data 938 km 583 mi estimated
Safety
Euro NCAP ★★★★★ (2019) ★★★★★ (2014)

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.

Photo credits