Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Skoda Kodiaq II vs Mercedes-Benz EQC N293: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width EQC N293 232 mm9 in wider
  • Height Kodiaq II 55 mm2 in taller
  • Boot Kodiaq II 410 L14.5 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Kodiaq II Skoda · 2023–present · SUV Kodiaq II 4,758 × 1,864 × 1,679 mm15 ft 7 in × 6 ft 1 in × 5 ft 6 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

EQC N293 Mercedes-Benz · 2019–2023 · SUV EQC N293 4,761 × 2,096 × 1,624 mm15 ft 7 in × 6 ft 11 in × 5 ft 4 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Kodiaq II
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: EQC N293
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,789 mmWheelbase 9 ft 2 inLength 4,758 mmLength 15 ft 7 in1,679 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,873 mmWheelbase 9 ft 5 inLength 4,761 mmLength 15 ft 7 in1,624 mm5 ft 4 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Kodiaq II is 3 mm0.1 in shorter, 232 mm9 in narrower and 55 mm2 in taller than the EQC N293. Its wheelbase is 84 mm3 in shorter.

DimensionKodiaq IIEQC N293Difference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,758 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,758 mm4,761 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,761 mm −3 mm−0.1 in −0.1%
Width1,864 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,864 mm2,096 mm6 ft 11 in6 ft 11 in2,096 mm −232 mm−9 in −11.1%
Height1,679 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,679 mm1,624 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,624 mm +55 mm+2 in +3.4%
Wheelbase2,789 mm9 ft 2 in9 ft 2 in2,789 mm2,873 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,873 mm −84 mm−3 in −2.9%
Footprint8.87 m²95.5 sq ft95.5 sq ft8.87 m²9.98 m²107.4 sq ft107.4 sq ft9.98 m² −1.11 m²−11.9 sq ft −11.1%
Boot910 L32.1 cu ft32.1 cu ft910 L500 L17.7 cu ft17.7 cu ft500 L +410 L+14.5 cu ft +82.0%
Kerb weight1,661–1,815 kg3,662–4,001 lb3,662–4,001 lb1,661–1,815 kg2,435 kg5,368 lb5,368 lb2,435 kg −774 kg−1,706 lb −31.8%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Kodiaq II

Single garage
Tight 742 mm2 ft 5 in to spare in length, 568 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 242 mm10 in to spare in length, 318 mm1 ft 1 in each side

EQC N293

Single garage
Tight 739 mm2 ft 5 in to spare in length, 452 mm1 ft 6 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 239 mm9 in to spare in length, 202 mm8 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Skoda Kodiaq II or the Mercedes-Benz EQC N293?

The Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Kodiaq II is 3 mm shorter, 232 mm narrower and 55 mm taller than the EQC N293. Its wheelbase is 84 mm shorter.

Will the Skoda Kodiaq II and the Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Skoda Kodiaq II fits, but it is tight to get out (742 mm to spare in length, 568 mm each side). The Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 fits, but it is tight to get out (739 mm to spare in length, 452 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Skoda Kodiaq II: 910 L against 500 L in the Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error