Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Mitsubishi Outlander GN vs Skoda Kodiaq II: size comparison

  • Length Kodiaq II 49 mm2 in longer
  • Width Outlander GN 33 mm1 in wider
  • Height Outlander GN 66 mm3 in taller

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Outlander GN Mitsubishi · 2021–present · SUV Outlander GN 4,709 × 1,897 × 1,745 mm15 ft 5 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 9 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Kodiaq II Skoda · 2023–present · SUV Kodiaq II 4,758 × 1,864 × 1,679 mm15 ft 7 in × 6 ft 1 in × 5 ft 6 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Outlander GN
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Kodiaq II
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft22 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,709 mmLength 15 ft 5 in1,745 mm5 ft 9 inWheelbase 2,789 mmWheelbase 9 ft 2 inLength 4,758 mmLength 15 ft 7 in1,679 mm5 ft 6 in

Scale about 1:23 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Outlander GN is 49 mm2 in shorter, 33 mm1 in wider and 66 mm3 in taller than the Kodiaq II. Its wheelbase is 84 mm3 in shorter.

DimensionOutlander GNKodiaq IIDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,709 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,709 mm4,758 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,758 mm −49 mm−2 in −1.0%
Width1,897 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,897 mm1,864 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,864 mm +33 mm+1 in +1.8%
Height1,745 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,745 mm1,679 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,679 mm +66 mm+3 in +3.9%
Wheelbase2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm2,789 mm9 ft 2 in9 ft 2 in2,789 mm −84 mm−3 in −3.0%
Footprint8.93 m²96.2 sq ft96.2 sq ft8.93 m²8.87 m²95.5 sq ft95.5 sq ft8.87 m² +0.06 m²+0.7 sq ft +0.7%
BootNot in our catalog yet910 L32.1 cu ft32.1 cu ft910 L -
Kerb weight1,630–2,179 kg3,594–4,804 lb3,594–4,804 lb1,630–2,179 kg1,661–1,815 kg3,662–4,001 lb3,662–4,001 lb1,661–1,815 kg −31 kg−68 lb −1.9%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Outlander GN

Single garage
Tight 791 mm2 ft 7 in to spare in length, 552 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 291 mm11 in to spare in length, 302 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Kodiaq II

Single garage
Tight 742 mm2 ft 5 in to spare in length, 568 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 242 mm10 in to spare in length, 318 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Mitsubishi Outlander GN or the Skoda Kodiaq II?

The Mitsubishi Outlander GN is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Outlander GN is 49 mm shorter, 33 mm wider and 66 mm taller than the Kodiaq II. Its wheelbase is 84 mm shorter.

Will the Mitsubishi Outlander GN and the Skoda Kodiaq II fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mitsubishi Outlander GN fits, but it is tight to get out (791 mm to spare in length, 552 mm each side). The Skoda Kodiaq II fits, but it is tight to get out (742 mm to spare in length, 568 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Compare other cars

Report an error