Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 vs Skoda Kodiaq II: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width EQC N293 232 mm9 in wider
  • Height Kodiaq II 55 mm2 in taller
  • Boot Kodiaq II 410 L14.5 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

EQC N293 Mercedes-Benz · 2019–2023 · SUV EQC N293 4,761 × 2,096 × 1,624 mm15 ft 7 in × 6 ft 11 in × 5 ft 4 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Kodiaq II Skoda · 2023–present · SUV Kodiaq II 4,758 × 1,864 × 1,679 mm15 ft 7 in × 6 ft 1 in × 5 ft 6 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: EQC N293
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Kodiaq II
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,873 mmWheelbase 9 ft 5 inLength 4,761 mmLength 15 ft 7 in1,624 mm5 ft 4 inWheelbase 2,789 mmWheelbase 9 ft 2 inLength 4,758 mmLength 15 ft 7 in1,679 mm5 ft 6 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The EQC N293 is 3 mm0.1 in longer, 232 mm9 in wider and 55 mm2 in lower than the Kodiaq II. Its wheelbase is 84 mm3 in longer.

DimensionEQC N293Kodiaq IIDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,761 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,761 mm4,758 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,758 mm +3 mm+0.1 in +0.1%
Width2,096 mm6 ft 11 in6 ft 11 in2,096 mm1,864 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,864 mm +232 mm+9 in +12.4%
Height1,624 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,624 mm1,679 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,679 mm −55 mm−2 in −3.3%
Wheelbase2,873 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,873 mm2,789 mm9 ft 2 in9 ft 2 in2,789 mm +84 mm+3 in +3.0%
Footprint9.98 m²107.4 sq ft107.4 sq ft9.98 m²8.87 m²95.5 sq ft95.5 sq ft8.87 m² +1.11 m²+11.9 sq ft +12.5%
Boot500 L17.7 cu ft17.7 cu ft500 L910 L32.1 cu ft32.1 cu ft910 L −410 L−14.5 cu ft −45.1%
Kerb weight2,435 kg5,368 lb5,368 lb2,435 kg1,661–1,815 kg3,662–4,001 lb3,662–4,001 lb1,661–1,815 kg +774 kg+1,706 lb +46.6%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

EQC N293

Single garage
Tight 739 mm2 ft 5 in to spare in length, 452 mm1 ft 6 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 239 mm9 in to spare in length, 202 mm8 in each side

Kodiaq II

Single garage
Tight 742 mm2 ft 5 in to spare in length, 568 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 242 mm10 in to spare in length, 318 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 or the Skoda Kodiaq II?

The Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The EQC N293 is 3 mm longer, 232 mm wider and 55 mm lower than the Kodiaq II. Its wheelbase is 84 mm longer.

Will the Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 and the Skoda Kodiaq II fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 fits, but it is tight to get out (739 mm to spare in length, 452 mm each side). The Skoda Kodiaq II fits, but it is tight to get out (742 mm to spare in length, 568 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Skoda Kodiaq II: 910 L against 500 L in the Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error