Size comparison · drawn to scale
Volvo EX60 I vs Ford Edge II CD539: size comparison
- Length About the same length
- Width Edge II CD539 20 mm0.8 in wider
- Height Edge II CD539 51 mm2 in taller
- Boot Edge II CD539 79 L2.8 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The EX60 I is 5 mm0.2 in shorter, 20 mm0.8 in narrower and 51 mm2 in lower than the Edge II CD539. Its wheelbase is 122 mm5 in longer.
| Dimension | EX60 I | Edge II CD539 | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,803 mm15 ft 9 in15 ft 9 in4,803 mm | 4,808 mm15 ft 9 in15 ft 9 in4,808 mm | −5 mm−0.2 in −0.1% |
| Width | 1,908 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,908 mm | 1,928 mm6 ft 4 in6 ft 4 in1,928 mm | −20 mm−0.8 in −1.0% |
| Height | 1,635 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,635 mm | 1,686 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,686 mm | −51 mm−2 in −3.0% |
| Wheelbase | 2,970 mm9 ft 9 in9 ft 9 in2,970 mm | 2,848 mm9 ft 4 in9 ft 4 in2,848 mm | +122 mm+5 in +4.3% |
| Footprint | 9.16 m²98.6 sq ft98.6 sq ft9.16 m² | 9.27 m²99.8 sq ft99.8 sq ft9.27 m² | −0.11 m²−1.1 sq ft −1.1% |
| Boot | 523 L18.5 cu ft18.5 cu ft523 L | 602 L21.3 cu ft21.3 cu ft602 L | −79 L−2.8 cu ft −13.1% |
| Kerb weight | 2,189–2,431 kg4,826–5,359 lb4,826–5,359 lb2,189–2,431 kg | 1,912–1,949 kg4,215–4,297 lb4,215–4,297 lb1,912–1,949 kg | +277 kg+611 lb +14.5% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
EX60 I
- Single garage
- Tight 697 mm2 ft 3 in to spare in length, 546 mm1 ft 9 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 197 mm8 in to spare in length, 296 mm1 ft 0 in each side
Edge II CD539
- Single garage
- Tight 692 mm2 ft 3 in to spare in length, 536 mm1 ft 9 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 192 mm8 in to spare in length, 286 mm11 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Volvo EX60 I or the Ford Edge II CD539?
The Ford Edge II CD539 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The EX60 I is 5 mm shorter, 20 mm narrower and 51 mm lower than the Edge II CD539. Its wheelbase is 122 mm longer.
Will the Volvo EX60 I and the Ford Edge II CD539 fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Volvo EX60 I fits, but it is tight to get out (697 mm to spare in length, 546 mm each side). The Ford Edge II CD539 fits, but it is tight to get out (692 mm to spare in length, 536 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Ford Edge II CD539: 602 L against 523 L in the Volvo EX60 I (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.