Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Ford Edge II CD539 vs Volvo EX60 I: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width Edge II CD539 20 mm0.8 in wider
  • Height Edge II CD539 51 mm2 in taller
  • Boot Edge II CD539 79 L2.8 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Edge II CD539 Ford · 2015–2024 · SUV Edge II CD539 4,808 × 1,928 × 1,686 mm15 ft 9 in × 6 ft 4 in × 5 ft 6 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

EX60 I Volvo · 2026–present · SUV EX60 I 4,803 × 1,908 × 1,635 mm15 ft 9 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 4 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Edge II CD539
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: EX60 I
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,848 mmWheelbase 9 ft 4 inLength 4,808 mmLength 15 ft 9 in1,686 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,970 mmWheelbase 9 ft 9 inLength 4,803 mmLength 15 ft 9 in1,635 mm5 ft 4 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Edge II CD539 is 5 mm0.2 in longer, 20 mm0.8 in wider and 51 mm2 in taller than the EX60 I. Its wheelbase is 122 mm5 in shorter.

DimensionEdge II CD539EX60 IDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,808 mm15 ft 9 in15 ft 9 in4,808 mm4,803 mm15 ft 9 in15 ft 9 in4,803 mm +5 mm+0.2 in +0.1%
Width1,928 mm6 ft 4 in6 ft 4 in1,928 mm1,908 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,908 mm +20 mm+0.8 in +1.0%
Height1,686 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,686 mm1,635 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,635 mm +51 mm+2 in +3.1%
Wheelbase2,848 mm9 ft 4 in9 ft 4 in2,848 mm2,970 mm9 ft 9 in9 ft 9 in2,970 mm −122 mm−5 in −4.1%
Footprint9.27 m²99.8 sq ft99.8 sq ft9.27 m²9.16 m²98.6 sq ft98.6 sq ft9.16 m² +0.11 m²+1.1 sq ft +1.2%
Boot602 L21.3 cu ft21.3 cu ft602 L523 L18.5 cu ft18.5 cu ft523 L +79 L+2.8 cu ft +15.1%
Kerb weight1,912–1,949 kg4,215–4,297 lb4,215–4,297 lb1,912–1,949 kg2,189–2,431 kg4,826–5,359 lb4,826–5,359 lb2,189–2,431 kg −277 kg−611 lb −12.7%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Edge II CD539

Single garage
Tight 692 mm2 ft 3 in to spare in length, 536 mm1 ft 9 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 192 mm8 in to spare in length, 286 mm11 in each side

EX60 I

Single garage
Tight 697 mm2 ft 3 in to spare in length, 546 mm1 ft 9 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 197 mm8 in to spare in length, 296 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Ford Edge II CD539 or the Volvo EX60 I?

The Ford Edge II CD539 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Edge II CD539 is 5 mm longer, 20 mm wider and 51 mm taller than the EX60 I. Its wheelbase is 122 mm shorter.

Will the Ford Edge II CD539 and the Volvo EX60 I fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Ford Edge II CD539 fits, but it is tight to get out (692 mm to spare in length, 536 mm each side). The Volvo EX60 I fits, but it is tight to get out (697 mm to spare in length, 546 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Ford Edge II CD539: 602 L against 523 L in the Volvo EX60 I (seats up, as quoted by the maker).