ZIL-131 vs GAZ-66: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data — no editorial review of this pair yet.

ZIL · 1967–1990
ZIL-131
- Power
- 77 kW105 PS
- Kerb mass
- —
Photo: Lorenz King, Giessen university, JLU.de / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

GAZ · 1964–1999
GAZ-66
- Power
- 88 kW120 PS
- Kerb mass
- 3,440 kg
Photo: Calreyn88 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City GAZ-66 Length: 5,805 mm vs 7,040 mm; Width: 2,322 mm vs 2,500 mm
In plain words
GAZ-66 has more power: 88 kW (120 PS) against 77 kW (105 PS) for ZIL-131. ZIL-131 is 1,235 mm longer than GAZ-66 (7,040 mm vs 5,805 mm). GAZ-66 is the older design (from 1964); ZIL-131 arrived in 1967. On the catalog figures, the GAZ-66 is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the ZIL-131 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| ZIL-131 | GAZ-66 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 7,040 mm277.2 in † | 5,805 mm228.5 in −1,235 mm −48.6 in −17.5% |
| Width | 2,500 mm98.4 in † | 2,322 mm91.4 in −178 mm −7.0 in −7.1% |
| Height | 2,480 mm97.6 in † | 2,520 mm99.2 in +40 mm +1.6 in +1.6% |
| Wheelbase | 3,975 mm156.5 in † | 3,300 mm129.9 in −675 mm −26.6 in −17.0% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Too long and too wide | Too long and too wide |
Difference vs ZIL-131 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| ZIL-131 | GAZ-66 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | diesel · 77 kW (105 PS) | petrol · 88 kW (120 PS) |
| Production years | 1967–1990 | 1964–1999 |
| Body | Truck | Truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Country | Soviet Union (USSR) | Soviet Union (USSR) |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 77 kW (105 PS) 103 hp | 88 kW (120 PS) 118 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 77–110 kW (105–150 PS) 103–148 hp | 85–88 kW (116–120 PS) 114–118 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 26 kW/t 31 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Drive | No data | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 7,040 mm 277.2 in † | 5,805 mm 228.5 in |
| Width | 2,500 mm 98.4 in † | 2,322 mm 91.4 in |
| Height | 2,480 mm 97.6 in † | 2,520 mm 99.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 3,975 mm 156.5 in † | 3,300 mm 129.9 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 3,440 kg 7,584 lb |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Country.
Better marks the stronger figure — only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.