Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs Honda CR-V: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Mitsubishi · 2013–2021
Outlander PHEV
- Power
- 147 kW200 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Honda · 2016–2022
CR-V
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,685 kg
Photo: EurovisionNim / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
In plain words
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has more power: 147 kW (200 PS) against 110 kW (150 PS) for Honda CR-V. Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is the older design (from 2013); Honda CR-V arrived in 2016. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV | Honda CR-V | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 PHEV · plug-in hybrid · 147 kW (200 PS) | 2.0 · petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) |
| Production years | 2013–2021 | 2016–2022 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 147 kW (200 PS) 197 hp Better | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp |
| Power, all versions | 60–147 kW (82–200 PS) 80–197 hp | 88–142 kW (120–193 PS) 118–190 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 65 kW/t 79 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Petrol |
| Engine | 4 cyl | 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,570 mm 179.9 in |
| Width | No data | 1,820 mm 71.7 in |
| Height | No data | 1,657 mm 65.2 in † |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,620 mm 103.1 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 463 l 16.4 cu ft † | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 7.9 l/100 km 29.8 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 156 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €2,070/year estimated |
| Electric | ||
| Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully. | 12 kWh | No data |
| Electric range Why it matters: A longer range means fewer charging stops on long journeys. | 52 km 32 mi | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2013) | ★★★★★ (2019) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Country.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.