Honda CR-V VI vs Nissan X-Trail T33: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Honda · 2022–present
CR-V VI
- Power
- 135 kW184 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 9.0 s
- Top speed
- 194 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,821 kg
Nissan · 2020–present
X-Trail T33
- Power
- 150 kW204 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 8.0 s
- Top speed
- 170 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,664 kg
Version spec sheet All generations
Photo: Harvey Bold / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: CR-V VI 2 X-Trail T33 1
- Family Too close to call Boot: 587 l vs 560 l
- City CR-V VI Consumption: 5.9 l/100 km vs 6.3 l/100 km
- Performance X-Trail T33 Power per tonne: 90 kW/t vs 74 kW/t; 0–100 km/h: 8.0 s vs 9.0 s
- Running costs CR-V VI Fuel per year: €1,550 vs €1,650 (estimated)
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Nissan X-Trail T33 is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s against 9.0 s for Honda CR-V VI. Honda CR-V VI is 14 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail T33 (4,694 mm vs 4,680 mm). Nissan X-Trail T33 is lighter by 157 kg (1,664 kg vs 1,821 kg). Honda CR-V VI has the bigger boot: 587 l against 560 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,550 (Honda CR-V VI), €1,650 (Nissan X-Trail T33) (estimated). Nissan X-Trail T33 is the older design (from 2020); Honda CR-V VI arrived in 2022. On the catalog figures, the Honda CR-V VI is the pick for city and running costs; the Nissan X-Trail T33 is the pick for performance.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | CR-V VI | X-Trail T33 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 445 | C · 478 |
| Power | 41 | 47 |
| Grip | 28 | 38 |
| Handling | 47 | 49 |
| Top speed | 36 | 27 |
| Launch | 37 | 42 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 X-Trail T33e-POWER · hybrid · 150 kW (204 PS) 15.96 sat 138 km/h
- 2 CR-V VI2.0 e:HEV · hybrid · 135 kW (184 PS) 16.55 sat 133 km/h · +0.59 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| CR-V VI | X-Trail T33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,694 mm184.8 in † | 4,680 mm184.3 in −14 mm −0.6 in −0.3% |
| Width | 1,866 mm73.5 in | 1,840 mm72.4 in −26 mm −1.0 in −1.4% |
| Height | 1,682 mm66.2 in † | 1,720 mm67.7 in +38 mm +1.5 in +2.3% |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm106.3 in | 2,705 mm106.5 in +5 mm +0.2 in +0.2% |
| Kerb weight | 1,821 kg4,015 lb | 1,664 kg3,668 lb −157 kg −346 lb −8.6% |
| Boot | 587 l20.7 cu ft | 560 l19.8 cu ft −27 l −1.0 cu ft −4.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | Yes |
Difference vs CR-V VI (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Honda CR-V VI | Nissan X-Trail T33 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 e:HEV · hybrid · 135 kW (184 PS) | e-POWER · hybrid · 150 kW (204 PS) |
| Production years | 2022–present | 2020–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 135 kW (184 PS) 181 hp | 150 kW (204 PS) 201 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 135 kW (184 PS) 181 hp | 120–157 kW (163–213 PS) 161–211 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 9.0 s | 8.0 s Better |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 194 km/h 121 mph Better | 170 km/h 106 mph |
| Power per tonne | 74 kW/t 90 hp/ton calculated | 90 kW/t 110 hp/ton calculated Better |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Engine | 4 cyl | 1,500 cc 1.5 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 1-speed single-speed |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,694 mm 184.8 in † | 4,680 mm 184.3 in |
| Width | 1,866 mm 73.5 in | 1,840 mm 72.4 in |
| Height | 1,682 mm 66.2 in † | 1,720 mm 67.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm 106.3 in | 2,705 mm 106.5 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,821 kg 4,015 lb | 1,664 kg 3,668 lb Better |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 587 l 20.7 cu ft Better | 560 l 19.8 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 57 l 15.1 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 5.9 l/100 km 39.9 mpg US Better | 6.3 l/100 km 37.3 mpg US |
| CO₂ | 134 g/km Better | 143 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,550/year estimated Better | €1,650/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | 966 km 600 mi estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★☆ (2024) | ★★★★★ (2021) Better |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (5): Body, Class, Country, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.