Nissan X-Trail T33 vs Honda CR-V VI: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Nissan · 2020–present
X-Trail T33
- Power
- 120 kW163 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 9.6 s
- Top speed
- 200 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,671 kg
Version spec sheet All generations
Photo: Harvey Bold / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
Honda · 2022–present
CR-V VI
- Power
- 135 kW184 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 9.4 s
- Top speed
- 195 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,988 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: X-Trail T33 1 CR-V VI 2
- Family Too close to call Boot: 560 l vs 617 l
- City CR-V VI Consumption: 0.8 l/100 km vs 7.1 l/100 km
- Performance X-Trail T33 Power per tonne: 72 kW/t vs 68 kW/t
- Running costs CR-V VI Fuel per year: €210 vs €1,860 (estimated)
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Honda CR-V VI is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 9.4 s against 9.6 s for Nissan X-Trail T33. Honda CR-V VI is 14 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail T33 (4,694 mm vs 4,680 mm). Nissan X-Trail T33 is lighter by 317 kg (1,671 kg vs 1,988 kg). Honda CR-V VI has the bigger boot: 617 l against 560 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,860 (Nissan X-Trail T33), €210 (Honda CR-V VI) (estimated). Nissan X-Trail T33 is the older design (from 2020); Honda CR-V VI arrived in 2022. On the catalog figures, the Honda CR-V VI is the pick for city and running costs; the Nissan X-Trail T33 is the pick for performance.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | X-Trail T33 | CR-V VI |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 446 | C · 426 |
| Power | 40 | 38 |
| Grip | 30 | 26 |
| Handling | 49 | 44 |
| Top speed | 38 | 37 |
| Launch | 34 | 35 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 CR-V VI2.0 e:PHEV · plug-in hybrid · 135 kW (184 PS) 16.80 sat 132 km/h
- 2 X-Trail T331.5 VC-Turbo mild hybrid · petrol · 120 kW (163 PS) 16.89 sat 131 km/h · +0.09 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| X-Trail T33 | CR-V VI | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,680 mm184.3 in † | 4,694 mm184.8 in +14 mm +0.6 in +0.3% |
| Width | 1,840 mm72.4 in † | 1,866 mm73.5 in +26 mm +1.0 in +1.4% |
| Height | 1,720 mm67.7 in † | 1,682 mm66.2 in −38 mm −1.5 in −2.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,705 mm106.5 in † | 2,700 mm106.3 in −5 mm −0.2 in −0.2% |
| Kerb weight | 1,671 kg3,684 lb | 1,988 kg4,383 lb +317 kg +699 lb +19.0% |
| Boot | 560 l19.8 cu ft † | 617 l21.8 cu ft +57 l +2.0 cu ft +10.2% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Tight |
Difference vs X-Trail T33 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Nissan X-Trail T33 | Honda CR-V VI | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.5 VC-Turbo mild hybrid · petrol · 120 kW (163 PS) | 2.0 e:PHEV · plug-in hybrid · 135 kW (184 PS) |
| Production years | 2020–present | 2022–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 120 kW (163 PS) 161 hp | 135 kW (184 PS) 181 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 120–157 kW (163–213 PS) 161–211 hp | 135 kW (184 PS) 181 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 9.6 s | 9.4 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 200 km/h 124 mph Better | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Power per tonne | 72 kW/t 87 hp/ton calculated Better | 68 kW/t 83 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Plug-in hybrid |
| Engine | 1,500 cc 1.5 l | 4 cyl |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,680 mm 184.3 in † | 4,694 mm 184.8 in |
| Width | 1,840 mm 72.4 in † | 1,866 mm 73.5 in |
| Height | 1,720 mm 67.7 in † | 1,682 mm 66.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,705 mm 106.5 in † | 2,700 mm 106.3 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb Better | 1,988 kg 4,383 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 560 l 19.8 cu ft † | 617 l 21.8 cu ft Better |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 47 l 12.4 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 7.1 l/100 km 33.1 mpg US | 0.8 l/100 km 294.0 mpg US Better |
| CO₂ | 160 g/km | 18 g/km Better |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,860/year estimated | €210/year estimated Better |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 5,875 km 3,651 mi estimated |
| Electric | ||
| Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully. | No data | 18 kWh |
| Electric range Why it matters: A longer range means fewer charging stops on long journeys. | No data | 82 km 51 mi |
| Energy use | No data | 15.6 kWh/100 km |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2021) Better | ★★★★☆ (2024) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Country, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.