Nissan X-Trail T33 vs Honda CR-V VI: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Nissan · 2020–present

X-Trail T33

C PI 478

Version (3 versions)

Power: 150 kW204 PS
0–100 km/h: 8.0 s
Top speed: 170 km/h
Kerb mass: 1,664 kg

Version spec sheet All generations

Photo: Harvey Bold / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

Honda · 2022–present

CR-V VI

C PI 426

Version (2 versions)

Power: 135 kW184 PS
0–100 km/h: 9.4 s
Top speed: 195 km/h
Kerb mass: 1,988 kg

Version spec sheet

Photo: Chanokchon / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: X-Trail T33 1 CR-V VI 2

Family Too close to call Boot: 560 l vs 617 l
City CR-V VI Consumption: 0.8 l/100 km vs 6.3 l/100 km
Performance X-Trail T33 Power per tonne: 90 kW/t vs 68 kW/t; 0–100 km/h: 8.0 s vs 9.4 s
Running costs CR-V VI Fuel per year: €210 vs €1,650 (estimated)
Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV

In plain words

Nissan X-Trail T33 is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s against 9.4 s for Honda CR-V VI. Honda CR-V VI is 14 mm longer than Nissan X-Trail T33 (4,694 mm vs 4,680 mm). Nissan X-Trail T33 is lighter by 324 kg (1,664 kg vs 1,988 kg). Honda CR-V VI has the bigger boot: 617 l against 560 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,650 (Nissan X-Trail T33), €210 (Honda CR-V VI) (estimated). Nissan X-Trail T33 is the older design (from 2020); Honda CR-V VI arrived in 2022. On the catalog figures, the Honda CR-V VI is the pick for city and running costs; the Nissan X-Trail T33 is the pick for performance.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
Stat	X-Trail T33	CR-V VI
PI	C · 478	C · 426
Power	47	38
Grip	38	26
Handling	49	44
Top speed	27	37
Launch	42	35

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

1 X-Trail T33e-POWER · hybrid · 150 kW (204 PS) 15.96 sat 138 km/h
2 CR-V VI2.0 e:PHEV · plug-in hybrid · 135 kW (184 PS) 16.80 sat 132 km/h · +0.84 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

X-Trail T33 · CR-V VI

	X-Trail T33	CR-V VI
Length	4,680 mm184.3 in	4,694 mm184.8 in +14 mm +0.6 in +0.3%
Width	1,840 mm72.4 in	1,866 mm73.5 in +26 mm +1.0 in +1.4%
Height	1,720 mm67.7 in	1,682 mm66.2 in −38 mm −1.5 in −2.2%
Wheelbase	2,705 mm106.5 in	2,700 mm106.3 in −5 mm −0.2 in −0.2%
Kerb weight	1,664 kg3,668 lb	1,988 kg4,383 lb +324 kg +714 lb +19.5%
Boot	560 l19.8 cu ft	617 l21.8 cu ft +57 l +2.0 cu ft +10.2%
Fits a standard garage?	Yes	Tight

Difference vs X-Trail T33 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

General
	Nissan X-Trail T33	Honda CR-V VI
Version	e-POWER · hybrid · 150 kW (204 PS)	2.0 e:PHEV · plug-in hybrid · 135 kW (184 PS)
Production years	2020–present	2022–present
Body	SUV	SUV
Class	SUV / crossover	SUV / crossover
Country	Japan	Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load.	150 kW (204 PS) 201 hp Better	135 kW (184 PS) 181 hp
Power, all versions	120–157 kW (163–213 PS) 161–211 hp	135 kW (184 PS) 181 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills.	330 Nm 243 lb-ft	No data
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads.	8.0 s Better	9.4 s
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it.	170 km/h 106 mph	195 km/h 121 mph Better
Power per tonne	90 kW/t 110 hp/ton calculated Better	68 kW/t 83 hp/ton calculated
Engine and transmission
Fuel	Hybrid	Plug-in hybrid
Engine	1,500 cc 1.5 l	4 cyl
Gearbox	1-speed single-speed	No data
Drive	Front-wheel drive	Front-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length	4,680 mm 184.3 in	4,694 mm 184.8 in
Width	1,840 mm 72.4 in	1,866 mm 73.5 in
Height	1,720 mm 67.7 in	1,682 mm 66.2 in
Wheelbase	2,705 mm 106.5 in	2,700 mm 106.3 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy.	1,664 kg 3,668 lb Better	1,988 kg 4,383 lb
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram.	560 l 19.8 cu ft	617 l 21.8 cu ft Better
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops.	No data	47 l 12.4 gal US
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip.	6.3 l/100 km 37.3 mpg US	0.8 l/100 km 294.0 mpg US Better
CO₂	143 g/km	18 g/km Better
Fuel cost per year	€1,650/year estimated	€210/year estimated Better
Range on a full tank	No data	5,875 km 3,651 mi estimated
Electric
Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully.	No data	18 kWh
Electric range Why it matters: A longer range means fewer charging stops on long journeys.	No data	82 km 51 mi
Energy use	No data	15.6 kWh/100 km
Safety
Euro NCAP	★★★★★ (2021) Better	★★★★☆ (2024)

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.