Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Mitsubishi Outlander GF vs Honda CR-V: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Mitsubishi Outlander GF

Mitsubishi · 2012–2021

Outlander GF

C PI 499

Power
110 kW150 PS
Kerb mass
1,495 kg

All generations

Photo: Dinkun Chen / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Honda CR-V

Honda · 2016–2022

CR-V

C PI 437

Power
110 kW150 PS
Kerb mass
1,685 kg

Photo: EurovisionNim / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Outlander GF 1 CR-V 0

  • City Too close to call Length: 4,655 mm vs 4,570 mm
  • Performance Outlander GF Power per tonne: 74 kW/t vs 65 kW/t

In plain words

Mitsubishi Outlander GF is 85 mm longer than Honda CR-V (4,655 mm vs 4,570 mm). Mitsubishi Outlander GF is lighter by 190 kg (1,495 kg vs 1,685 kg). Mitsubishi Outlander GF is the older design (from 2012); Honda CR-V arrived in 2016. On the catalog figures, the Mitsubishi Outlander GF is the pick for performance.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
StatOutlander GFCR-V
PIC · 499C · 437
Power 40 37
Grip 49 30
Handling 53 50
Top speed 35 35
Launch 46 35

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

  1. 1 Outlander GF2.0 MIVEC petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) 15.47 sat 137 km/h
  2. 2 CR-V2.0 · petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) 16.82 sat 130 km/h · +1.35 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

Outlander GF · CR-V
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,670 mmWheelbase 8 ft 9 inLength 4,655 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,680 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,620 mmWheelbase 8 ft 7 inLength 4,570 mmLength 15 ft 0 in1,657 mm5 ft 5 in
Outlander GFCR-V
Length 4,655 mm183.3 in † 4,570 mm179.9 in −85 mm −3.3 in −1.8%
Width 1,800 mm70.9 in † 1,820 mm71.7 in +20 mm +0.8 in +1.1%
Height 1,680 mm66.1 in † 1,657 mm65.2 in † −23 mm −0.9 in −1.4%
Wheelbase 2,670 mm105.1 in 2,620 mm103.1 in −50 mm −2.0 in −1.9%
Kerb weight 1,495 kg3,296 lb 1,685 kg3,715 lb +190 kg +419 lb +12.7%
Fits a standard garage? YesYes

Difference vs Outlander GF (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

Mitsubishi Outlander GFHonda CR-V
General
Version 2.0 MIVEC petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) 2.0 · petrol · 110 kW (150 PS)
Production years 2012–2021 2016–2022
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country Japan Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp
Power, all versions 110–165 kW (150–224 PS) 148–221 hp 88–142 kW (120–193 PS) 118–190 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. 195 Nm 144 lb-ft No data
Power per tonne 74 kW/t 90 hp/ton calculated Better 65 kW/t 79 hp/ton calculated
Engine and transmission
Fuel No data Petrol
Engine 1,998 cc 2.0 l 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l
Gearbox CVT No data
Drive Four-wheel drive (4×4) No data
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,655 mm 183.3 in † 4,570 mm 179.9 in
Width 1,800 mm 70.9 in † 1,820 mm 71.7 in
Height 1,680 mm 66.1 in † 1,657 mm 65.2 in †
Wheelbase 2,670 mm 105.1 in 2,620 mm 103.1 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 1,495 kg 3,296 lb Better 1,685 kg 3,715 lb
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 591 l 20.9 cu ft † No data
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. No data 7.9 l/100 km 29.8 mpg US
CO₂ No data 156 g/km
Fuel cost per year No data €2,070/year estimated
Safety
Euro NCAP ★★★★★ (2012) ★★★★★ (2019)

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.

Photo credits