Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Ural-4320 vs KrAZ-260: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Ural-4320

Ural · 1977–present

Ural-4320

Power
177 kW241 PS
Top speed
-
Kerb mass
-

Photo: Henk Obee / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
KrAZ-260

KrAZ · 1979–1993

KrAZ-260

D PI 112

Power
221 kW300 PS
Top speed
80 km/h
Kerb mass
12,775 kg

Photo: Svetlov Artem / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Ural-4320 2 KrAZ-260 0

  • City Ural-4320 Length: 7,366 mm vs 9,030 mm; Width: 2,500 mm vs 2,722 mm
  • Off-road Ural-4320 Drive and body: Multi-axle drive (6×6, 8×8…) · Truck vs All-wheel drive · Truck

In plain words

KrAZ-260 has more power: 221 kW (300 PS) against 177 kW (241 PS) for Ural-4320. KrAZ-260 is 1,664 mm longer than Ural-4320 (9,030 mm vs 7,366 mm). Ural-4320 is the older design (from 1977); KrAZ-260 arrived in 1979. Ural-4320 is still in production; KrAZ-260 is not. On the catalog figures, the Ural-4320 is the pick for city and off-road. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Ural-4320 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

Ural-4320 · KrAZ-260
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 m9 m10 m11 m12 m1 m2 m3 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft22 ft23 ft24 ft25 ft26 ft27 ft28 ft29 ft30 ft31 ft32 ft33 ft34 ft35 ft36 ft37 ft38 ft39 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ftLength 7,366 mmLength 24 ft 2 in2,715 mm8 ft 11 inWheelbase 4,600 mmWheelbase 15 ft 1 inLength 9,030 mmLength 29 ft 8 in3,115 mm10 ft 3 in
Ural-4320KrAZ-260
Length 7,366 mm290.0 in † 9,030 mm355.5 in +1,664 mm +65.5 in +22.6%
Width 2,500 mm98.4 in † 2,722 mm107.2 in +222 mm +8.7 in +8.9%
Height 2,715 mm106.9 in † 3,115 mm122.6 in +400 mm +15.7 in +14.7%
Fits a standard garage? Too long and too wideToo long and too wide

Difference vs Ural-4320 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

Ural-4320KrAZ-260
General
Version 14.9 YaMZ-238M2 · diesel · 177 kW (241 PS) 14.9 YaMZ-238L · diesel · 221 kW (300 PS)
Production years 1977–present 1979–1993
Body Truck Truck
Class Heavy truck Heavy truck
Country Soviet Union (USSR) Soviet Union (USSR)
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp 221 kW (300 PS) 296 hp Better
Power, all versions 132–229 kW (179–311 PS) 177–307 hp 221 kW (300 PS) 296 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. No data 1,079 Nm 796 lb-ft
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. No data 80 km/h 50 mph
Power per tonne No data 17 kW/t 21 hp/ton calculated
Engine and transmission
Fuel Diesel Diesel
Engine 14,860 cc · 8 cyl 14.9 l 14,860 cc · 8 cyl 14.9 l
Engine code YaMZ-238M2 YaMZ-238L
Drive Multi-axle drive (6×6, 8×8…) All-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 7,366 mm 290.0 in † 9,030 mm 355.5 in
Width 2,500 mm 98.4 in † 2,722 mm 107.2 in
Height 2,715 mm 106.9 in † 3,115 mm 122.6 in
Wheelbase No data 4,600 mm 181.1 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. No data 12,775 kg 28,164 lb
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. No data 165 l 43.6 gal US
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. No data 38.5 l/100 km 6.1 mpg US
Fuel cost per year No data €9,530/year estimated
Range on a full tank No data 429 km 267 mi estimated

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel. † from another version of this generation.

Photo credits