Kia Sportage NQ5 vs Nissan Qashqai III: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Kia · 2021–present
Sportage NQ5
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 10.3 s
- Top speed
- 182 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,526 kg
Version spec sheet All generations
Photo: Harvey Bold / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
Nissan · 2021–present
Qashqai III
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 10.2 s
- Top speed
- 196 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,405 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Sportage NQ5 1 Qashqai III 3
- Family Sportage NQ5 Boot: 591 l vs 504 l; Euro NCAP: 5★ vs 4★
- City Qashqai III Width: 1,835 mm vs 1,865 mm; Consumption: 6.3 l/100 km vs 6.7 l/100 km
- Long trips Qashqai III Range: 873 km vs 806 km (estimated)
- Performance Too close to call Power per tonne: 72 kW/t vs 73 kW/t
- Running costs Qashqai III Fuel per year: €1,650 vs €1,760 (estimated)
In plain words
Nissan Qashqai III is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 10.2 s against 10.3 s for Kia Sportage NQ5. Kia Sportage NQ5 is 90 mm longer than Nissan Qashqai III (4,515 mm vs 4,425 mm). Nissan Qashqai III is lighter by 121 kg (1,405 kg vs 1,526 kg). Kia Sportage NQ5 has the bigger boot: 591 l against 504 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,760 (Kia Sportage NQ5), €1,650 (Nissan Qashqai III) (estimated). On the catalog figures, the Kia Sportage NQ5 is the pick for family; the Nissan Qashqai III is the pick for city, long trips and running costs.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Sportage NQ5 | Qashqai III |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 445 | C · 459 |
| Power | 40 | 40 |
| Grip | 32 | 34 |
| Handling | 54 | 57 |
| Top speed | 32 | 37 |
| Launch | 31 | 31 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Qashqai III1.3 DIG-T mild hybrid 140 · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) 17.19 sat 127 km/h
- 2 Sportage NQ51.6 T-GDI 48V mild hybrid · petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) 17.34 sat 126 km/h · +0.15 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Sportage NQ5 | Qashqai III | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,515 mm177.8 in † | 4,425 mm174.2 in −90 mm −3.5 in −2.0% |
| Width | 1,865 mm73.4 in † | 1,835 mm72.2 in −30 mm −1.2 in −1.6% |
| Height | 1,650 mm65.0 in † | 1,625 mm64.0 in −25 mm −1.0 in −1.5% |
| Wheelbase | 2,680 mm105.5 in † | 2,665 mm104.9 in −15 mm −0.6 in −0.6% |
| Kerb weight | 1,526 kg3,364 lb | 1,405 kg3,097 lb −121 kg −267 lb −7.9% |
| Boot | 591 l20.9 cu ft | 504 l17.8 cu ft −87 l −3.1 cu ft −14.7% |
| Fuel tank | 54 l14.3 gal US | 55 l14.5 gal US +1 l +0.3 gal US +1.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | Yes |
Difference vs Sportage NQ5 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Kia Sportage NQ5 | Nissan Qashqai III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 T-GDI 48V mild hybrid · petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) | 1.3 DIG-T mild hybrid 140 · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) |
| Production years | 2021–present | 2021–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | South Korea | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp Better | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp |
| Power, all versions | 85–195 kW (116–265 PS) 114–261 hp | 103–139 kW (140–189 PS) 138–186 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 182 km/h 113 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph Better |
| Power per tonne | 72 kW/t 88 hp/ton calculated | 73 kW/t 89 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l | 4 cyl |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,515 mm 177.8 in † | 4,425 mm 174.2 in |
| Width | 1,865 mm 73.4 in † | 1,835 mm 72.2 in |
| Height | 1,650 mm 65.0 in † | 1,625 mm 64.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680 mm 105.5 in † | 2,665 mm 104.9 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb Better |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 591 l 20.9 cu ft Better | 504 l 17.8 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 54 l 14.3 gal US | 55 l 14.5 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 6.7 l/100 km 35.1 mpg US | 6.3 l/100 km 37.3 mpg US Better |
| CO₂ | 152 g/km | 142 g/km Better |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,760/year estimated | €1,650/year estimated Better |
| Range on a full tank | 806 km 501 mi estimated | 873 km 542 mi estimated Better |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2022) Better | ★★★★☆ (2025) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Production years, Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.