KrAZ-255 vs ZIL-131: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data — no editorial review of this pair yet.

KrAZ · 1967–1994
KrAZ-255
- Power
- 177 kW241 PS
- Top speed
- 71 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 11,950 kg

ZIL · 1967–1990
ZIL-131
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- Top speed
- —
- Kerb mass
- 6,700 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: KrAZ-255 0 ZIL-131 2
- City ZIL-131 Length: 7,040 mm vs 8,645 mm; Width: 2,500 mm vs 2,750 mm
- Performance ZIL-131 Power per tonne: 16 kW/t vs 15 kW/t
In plain words
KrAZ-255 has more power: 177 kW (241 PS) against 110 kW (150 PS) for ZIL-131. KrAZ-255 is 1,605 mm longer than ZIL-131 (8,645 mm vs 7,040 mm). ZIL-131 is lighter by 5,250 kg (6,700 kg vs 11,950 kg). On the catalog figures, the ZIL-131 is the pick for city and performance.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | KrAZ-255 | ZIL-131 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | D · 109 | D · 115 |
| Power | 1 | 1 |
| Grip | 1 | 1 |
| Handling | 1 | 1 |
| Top speed | 1 | 6 |
| Launch | 1 | 1 |
| Reliability | 53 | 53 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time — the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 ZIL-131petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) 25.88 sat 81 km/h
- 2 KrAZ-255255 14.9 MT · diesel · 177 kW (241 PS) 27.56 sat 71 km/h · +1.68 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| KrAZ-255 | ZIL-131 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 8,645 mm340.4 in | 7,040 mm277.2 in −1,605 mm −63.2 in −18.6% |
| Width | 2,750 mm108.3 in | 2,500 mm98.4 in −250 mm −9.8 in −9.1% |
| Height | 2,940 mm115.7 in | 2,480 mm97.6 in −460 mm −18.1 in −15.6% |
| Wheelbase | 5,300 mm208.7 in | 3,975 mm156.5 in −1,325 mm −52.2 in −25.0% |
| Kerb weight | 11,950 kg26,345 lb | 6,700 kg14,771 lb −5,250 kg −11,574 lb −43.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Too long and too wide | Too long and too wide |
Difference vs KrAZ-255 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| KrAZ-255 | ZIL-131 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 255 14.9 MT · diesel · 177 kW (241 PS) | petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) |
| Production years | 1967–1994 | 1967–1990 |
| Body | Truck | Truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Country | Soviet Union (USSR) | Soviet Union (USSR) |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp Better | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp |
| Power, all versions | 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp | 77–110 kW (105–150 PS) 103–148 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 883 Nm 651 lb-ft | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 71 km/h 44 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 15 kW/t 18 hp/ton calculated | 16 kW/t 20 hp/ton calculated Better |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 14,860 cc 14.9 l | 8 cyl |
| Gearbox | 5-speed manual | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 8,645 mm 340.4 in | 7,040 mm 277.2 in |
| Width | 2,750 mm 108.3 in | 2,500 mm 98.4 in |
| Height | 2,940 mm 115.7 in | 2,480 mm 97.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 5,300 mm 208.7 in | 3,975 mm 156.5 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 11,950 kg 26,345 lb | 6,700 kg 14,771 lb Better |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 165 l 43.6 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 40.0 l/100 km 5.9 mpg US | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €9,900/year estimated | No data |
| Range on a full tank | 413 km 257 mi estimated | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Country.
Better marks the stronger figure — only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.