Great Wall Hover H5 vs UAZ Hunter: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Great Wall · 2010–2020
Hover H5
- Power
- 100 kW136 PS

UAZ · 2003–present
Hunter
- Power
- 94 kW128 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Hunter Length: 4,025 mm vs 4,649 mm
In plain words
Great Wall Hover H5 has more power: 100 kW (136 PS) against 94 kW (128 PS) for UAZ Hunter. Great Wall Hover H5 is 624 mm longer than UAZ Hunter (4,649 mm vs 4,025 mm). UAZ Hunter is the older design (from 2003); Great Wall Hover H5 arrived in 2010. UAZ Hunter is still in production; Great Wall Hover H5 is not. On the catalog figures, the UAZ Hunter is the pick for city.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Hover H5 | Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,649 mm183.0 in | 4,025 mm158.5 in −624 mm −24.6 in −13.4% |
| Width | 1,810 mm71.3 in | 1,785 mm70.3 in −25 mm −1.0 in −1.4% |
| Height | 1,735 mm68.3 in | 2,050 mm80.7 in +315 mm +12.4 in +18.2% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Hover H5 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Great Wall Hover H5 | UAZ Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.4 · petrol · 100 kW (136 PS) | Classic · 94 kW (128 PS) |
| Production years | 2010–2020 | 2003–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp Better | 94 kW (128 PS) 126 hp |
| Power, all versions | 100–105 kW (136–143 PS) 134–141 hp | 82–94 kW (111–128 PS) 110–126 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | No data |
| Engine | 2,400 cc 2.4 l | 2,693 cc 2.7 l |
| Gearbox | No data | manual |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,649 mm 183.0 in | 4,025 mm 158.5 in |
| Width | 1,810 mm 71.3 in | 1,785 mm 70.3 in |
| Height | 1,735 mm 68.3 in | 2,050 mm 80.7 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,380 mm 93.7 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 810 l 28.6 cu ft | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).