Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

MG HS II vs Mazda CX-7 ER: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width HS II 18 mm0.7 in wider
  • Height HS II 17 mm0.7 in taller
  • Boot HS II 52 L1.8 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

HS II MG · 2024–present · SUV HS II 4,670 × 1,890 × 1,663 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 2 in × 5 ft 5 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

CX-7 ER Mazda · 2006–2012 · SUV CX-7 ER 4,676 × 1,872 × 1,646 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 2 in × 5 ft 5 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: HS II
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: CX-7 ER
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,765 mmWheelbase 9 ft 1 inLength 4,670 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,663 mm5 ft 5 inWheelbase 2,750 mmWheelbase 9 ft 0 inLength 4,676 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,646 mm5 ft 5 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The HS II is 6 mm0.2 in shorter, 18 mm0.7 in wider and 17 mm0.7 in taller than the CX-7 ER. Its wheelbase is 15 mm0.6 in longer.

DimensionHS IICX-7 ERDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,670 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,670 mm4,676 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,676 mm −6 mm−0.2 in −0.1%
Width1,890 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,890 mm1,872 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,872 mm +18 mm+0.7 in +1.0%
Height1,663 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,663 mm1,646 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,646 mm +17 mm+0.7 in +1.0%
Wheelbase2,765 mm9 ft 1 in9 ft 1 in2,765 mm2,750 mm9 ft 0 in9 ft 0 in2,750 mm +15 mm+0.6 in +0.5%
Footprint8.83 m²95.0 sq ft95.0 sq ft8.83 m²8.75 m²94.2 sq ft94.2 sq ft8.75 m² +0.07 m²+0.8 sq ft +0.8%
Boot507 L17.9 cu ft17.9 cu ft507 L455 L16.1 cu ft16.1 cu ft455 L +52 L+1.8 cu ft +11.4%
Kerb weight1,735–1,905 kg3,825–4,200 lb3,825–4,200 lb1,735–1,905 kgNot in our catalog yet -

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

HS II

Single garage
Tight 830 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 555 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 330 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 305 mm1 ft 0 in each side

CX-7 ER

Single garage
Tight 824 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 564 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 324 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 314 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the MG HS II or the Mazda CX-7 ER?

They are practically the same size. The HS II is 6 mm shorter, 18 mm wider and 17 mm taller than the CX-7 ER. Its wheelbase is 15 mm longer.

Will the MG HS II and the Mazda CX-7 ER fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The MG HS II fits, but it is tight to get out (830 mm to spare in length, 555 mm each side). The Mazda CX-7 ER fits, but it is tight to get out (824 mm to spare in length, 564 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The MG HS II: 507 L against 455 L in the Mazda CX-7 ER (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error