Size comparison · drawn to scale
Honda CR-V VI vs Volvo XC60 II: size comparison
- Length About the same length
- Width XC60 II 36 mm1 in wider
- Height CR-V VI 24 mm0.9 in taller
- Boot CR-V VI 134 L4.7 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The CR-V VI is 6 mm0.2 in longer, 36 mm1 in narrower and 24 mm0.9 in taller than the XC60 II. Its wheelbase is 165 mm6 in shorter.
| Dimension | CR-V VI | XC60 II | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,694 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,694 mm | 4,688 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,688 mm | +6 mm+0.2 in +0.1% |
| Width | 1,866 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,866 mm | 1,902 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,902 mm | −36 mm−1 in −1.9% |
| Height | 1,682 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,682 mm | 1,658 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,658 mm | +24 mm+0.9 in +1.4% |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,700 mm | 2,865 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,865 mm | −165 mm−6 in −5.8% |
| Footprint | 8.76 m²94.3 sq ft94.3 sq ft8.76 m² | 8.92 m²96.0 sq ft96.0 sq ft8.92 m² | −0.16 m²−1.7 sq ft −1.8% |
| Boot | 617 L21.8 cu ft21.8 cu ft617 L | 483 L17.1 cu ft17.1 cu ft483 L | +134 L+4.7 cu ft +27.7% |
| Kerb weight | 1,821–1,988 kg4,015–4,383 lb4,015–4,383 lb1,821–1,988 kg | 1,764–2,162 kg3,889–4,766 lb3,889–4,766 lb1,764–2,162 kg | +57 kg+126 lb +3.2% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
CR-V VI
- Single garage
- Tight 806 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 567 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 306 mm1 ft 0 in to spare in length, 317 mm1 ft 0 in each side
XC60 II
- Single garage
- Tight 812 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 549 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 312 mm1 ft 0 in to spare in length, 299 mm1 ft 0 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Honda CR-V VI or the Volvo XC60 II?
The Volvo XC60 II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The CR-V VI is 6 mm longer, 36 mm narrower and 24 mm taller than the XC60 II. Its wheelbase is 165 mm shorter.
Will the Honda CR-V VI and the Volvo XC60 II fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Honda CR-V VI fits, but it is tight to get out (806 mm to spare in length, 567 mm each side). The Volvo XC60 II fits, but it is tight to get out (812 mm to spare in length, 549 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Honda CR-V VI: 617 L against 483 L in the Volvo XC60 II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.

