Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Skoda Kodiaq II vs SsangYong Rexton W: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width Rexton W 36 mm1 in wider
  • Height Rexton W 161 mm6 in taller

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Kodiaq II Skoda · 2023–present · SUV Kodiaq II 4,758 × 1,864 × 1,679 mm15 ft 7 in × 6 ft 1 in × 5 ft 6 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Rexton W SsangYong · 2012–2017 · SUV Rexton W 4,755 × 1,900 × 1,840 mm15 ft 7 in × 6 ft 3 in × 6 ft 0 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Kodiaq II
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Rexton W
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft22 ft23 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ftWheelbase 2,789 mmWheelbase 9 ft 2 inLength 4,758 mmLength 15 ft 7 in1,679 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,835 mmWheelbase 9 ft 4 inLength 4,755 mmLength 15 ft 7 in1,840 mm6 ft 0 in

Scale about 1:24 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Kodiaq II is 3 mm0.1 in longer, 36 mm1 in narrower and 161 mm6 in lower than the Rexton W. Its wheelbase is 46 mm2 in shorter.

DimensionKodiaq IIRexton WDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,758 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,758 mm4,755 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,755 mm +3 mm+0.1 in +0.1%
Width1,864 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,864 mm1,900 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,900 mm −36 mm−1 in −1.9%
Height1,679 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,679 mm1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm −161 mm−6 in −8.8%
Wheelbase2,789 mm9 ft 2 in9 ft 2 in2,789 mm2,835 mm9 ft 4 in9 ft 4 in2,835 mm −46 mm−2 in −1.6%
Footprint8.87 m²95.5 sq ft95.5 sq ft8.87 m²9.03 m²97.2 sq ft97.2 sq ft9.03 m² −0.17 m²−1.8 sq ft −1.8%
Boot910 L32.1 cu ft32.1 cu ft910 LNot in our catalog yet -
Kerb weight1,661–1,815 kg3,662–4,001 lb3,662–4,001 lb1,661–1,815 kgNot in our catalog yet -

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Kodiaq II

Single garage
Tight 742 mm2 ft 5 in to spare in length, 568 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 242 mm10 in to spare in length, 318 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Rexton W

Single garage
Tight 745 mm2 ft 5 in to spare in length, 550 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 245 mm10 in to spare in length, 300 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Skoda Kodiaq II or the SsangYong Rexton W?

The SsangYong Rexton W is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Kodiaq II is 3 mm longer, 36 mm narrower and 161 mm lower than the Rexton W. Its wheelbase is 46 mm shorter.

Will the Skoda Kodiaq II and the SsangYong Rexton W fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Skoda Kodiaq II fits, but it is tight to get out (742 mm to spare in length, 568 mm each side). The SsangYong Rexton W fits, but it is tight to get out (745 mm to spare in length, 550 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Compare other cars

Report an error