Size comparison · drawn to scale
Renault Scenic III vs Opel Combo E: size comparison
- Length Combo E 35 mm1 in longer
- Width About the same width
- Height Combo E 189 mm7 in taller
- Boot Combo E 2,863 L101.1 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:24 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Scenic III is 35 mm1 in shorter, 3 mm0.1 in narrower and 189 mm7 in lower than the Combo E. Its wheelbase is 85 mm3 in shorter.
| Dimension | Scenic III | Combo E | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,366 mm14 ft 4 in14 ft 4 in4,366 mm | 4,401 mm14 ft 5 in14 ft 5 in4,401 mm | −35 mm−1 in −0.8% |
| Width | 1,845 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,845 mm | 1,848 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,848 mm | −3 mm−0.1 in −0.2% |
| Height | 1,636 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,636 mm | 1,825 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,825 mm | −189 mm−7 in −10.4% |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,700 mm | 2,785 mm9 ft 2 in9 ft 2 in2,785 mm | −85 mm−3 in −3.1% |
| Footprint | 8.06 m²86.7 sq ft86.7 sq ft8.06 m² | 8.13 m²87.5 sq ft87.5 sq ft8.13 m² | −0.08 m²−0.8 sq ft −1.0% |
| Boot | 437 L15.4 cu ft15.4 cu ft437 L | 3,300 L116.5 cu ft116.5 cu ft3,300 L | −2,863 L−101.1 cu ft −86.8% |
| Kerb weight | Not in our catalog yet | 1,371 kg3,023 lb3,023 lb1,371 kg | - |
| Price new (EUR) | from about €19,600 (2009) | from about €20,980 (2018) | −€1,380 −6.6% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. New prices are list prices in EUR entered by our editors, with the year.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Scenic III
- Single garage
- Tight 1,134 mm3 ft 9 in to spare in length, 578 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 634 mm2 ft 1 in to spare in length, 328 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Combo E
- Single garage
- Tight 1,099 mm3 ft 7 in to spare in length, 576 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 599 mm2 ft 0 in to spare in length, 326 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Renault Scenic III or the Opel Combo E?
The Opel Combo E is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Scenic III is 35 mm shorter, 3 mm narrower and 189 mm lower than the Combo E. Its wheelbase is 85 mm shorter.
Will the Renault Scenic III and the Opel Combo E fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Renault Scenic III fits, but it is tight to get out (1,134 mm to spare in length, 578 mm each side). The Opel Combo E fits, but it is tight to get out (1,099 mm to spare in length, 576 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Opel Combo E: 3,300 L against 437 L in the Renault Scenic III (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.