Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Nissan X-Trail T32 vs Mitsubishi Outlander GN: size comparison

  • Length Outlander GN 69 mm3 in longer
  • Width Outlander GN 77 mm3 in wider
  • Height Outlander GN 35 mm1 in taller

Car 1 blue, solid outline

X-Trail T32 Nissan · 2013–2022 · SUV X-Trail T32 4,640 × 1,820 × 1,710 mm15 ft 3 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 7 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Outlander GN Mitsubishi · 2021–present · SUV Outlander GN 4,709 × 1,897 × 1,745 mm15 ft 5 in × 6 ft 3 in × 5 ft 9 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: X-Trail T32
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Outlander GN
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft22 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,640 mmLength 15 ft 3 in1,710 mm5 ft 7 inWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,709 mmLength 15 ft 5 in1,745 mm5 ft 9 in

Scale about 1:23 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The X-Trail T32 is 69 mm3 in shorter, 77 mm3 in narrower and 35 mm1 in lower than the Outlander GN. Its wheelbase is identical.

DimensionX-Trail T32Outlander GNDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,640 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,640 mm4,709 mm15 ft 5 in15 ft 5 in4,709 mm −69 mm−3 in −1.5%
Width1,820 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,820 mm1,897 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,897 mm −77 mm−3 in −4.1%
Height1,710 mm5 ft 7 in5 ft 7 in1,710 mm1,745 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,745 mm −35 mm−1 in −2.0%
Wheelbase2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm Same
Footprint8.44 m²90.9 sq ft90.9 sq ft8.44 m²8.93 m²96.2 sq ft96.2 sq ft8.93 m² −0.49 m²−5.3 sq ft −5.5%
Boot550 L19.4 cu ft19.4 cu ft550 LNot in our catalog yet -
Kerb weight1,505–1,775 kg3,318–3,913 lb3,318–3,913 lb1,505–1,775 kg1,630–2,179 kg3,594–4,804 lb3,594–4,804 lb1,630–2,179 kg −125 kg−276 lb −7.7%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

X-Trail T32

Single garage
Tight 860 mm2 ft 10 in to spare in length, 590 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 360 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 340 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Outlander GN

Single garage
Tight 791 mm2 ft 7 in to spare in length, 552 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 291 mm11 in to spare in length, 302 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Nissan X-Trail T32 or the Mitsubishi Outlander GN?

The Mitsubishi Outlander GN is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The X-Trail T32 is 69 mm shorter, 77 mm narrower and 35 mm lower than the Outlander GN. Its wheelbase is identical.

Will the Nissan X-Trail T32 and the Mitsubishi Outlander GN fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Nissan X-Trail T32 fits, but it is tight to get out (860 mm to spare in length, 590 mm each side). The Mitsubishi Outlander GN fits, but it is tight to get out (791 mm to spare in length, 552 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Compare other cars

Report an error