Size comparison · drawn to scale
Nissan X-Trail T32 vs Mitsubishi Outlander GF: size comparison
- Length Outlander GF 15 mm0.6 in longer
- Width X-Trail T32 20 mm0.8 in wider
- Height X-Trail T32 30 mm1 in taller
- Boot Outlander GF 41 L1.4 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The X-Trail T32 is 15 mm0.6 in shorter, 20 mm0.8 in wider and 30 mm1 in taller than the Outlander GF. Its wheelbase is 35 mm1 in longer.
| Dimension | X-Trail T32 | Outlander GF | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,640 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,640 mm | 4,655 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,655 mm | −15 mm−0.6 in −0.3% |
| Width | 1,820 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,820 mm | 1,800 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,800 mm | +20 mm+0.8 in +1.1% |
| Height | 1,710 mm5 ft 7 in5 ft 7 in1,710 mm | 1,680 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,680 mm | +30 mm+1 in +1.8% |
| Wheelbase | 2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm | 2,670 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,670 mm | +35 mm+1 in +1.3% |
| Footprint | 8.44 m²90.9 sq ft90.9 sq ft8.44 m² | 8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m² | +0.07 m²+0.7 sq ft +0.8% |
| Boot | 550 L19.4 cu ft19.4 cu ft550 L | 591 L20.9 cu ft20.9 cu ft591 L | −41 L−1.4 cu ft −6.9% |
| Kerb weight | 1,505–1,775 kg3,318–3,913 lb3,318–3,913 lb1,505–1,775 kg | 1,495 kg3,296 lb3,296 lb1,495 kg | +10 kg+22 lb +0.7% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
X-Trail T32
- Single garage
- Tight 860 mm2 ft 10 in to spare in length, 590 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 360 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 340 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Outlander GF
- Single garage
- Fits 845 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 600 mm2 ft 0 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 345 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 350 mm1 ft 2 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Nissan X-Trail T32 or the Mitsubishi Outlander GF?
The Nissan X-Trail T32 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The X-Trail T32 is 15 mm shorter, 20 mm wider and 30 mm taller than the Outlander GF. Its wheelbase is 35 mm longer.
Will the Nissan X-Trail T32 and the Mitsubishi Outlander GF fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Nissan X-Trail T32 fits, but it is tight to get out (860 mm to spare in length, 590 mm each side). The Mitsubishi Outlander GF fits with room to open the doors (845 mm to spare in length, 600 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mitsubishi Outlander GF: 591 L against 550 L in the Nissan X-Trail T32 (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.