Size comparison · drawn to scale
Mitsubishi Outlander CU vs Toyota RAV4 XA40: size comparison
- Length RAV4 XA40 20 mm0.8 in longer
- Width RAV4 XA40 95 mm4 in wider
- Height About the same height
- Boot RAV4 XA40 104 L3.7 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Outlander CU is 20 mm0.8 in shorter, 95 mm4 in narrower and the same height than the RAV4 XA40. Its wheelbase is 35 mm1 in shorter.
| Dimension | Outlander CU | RAV4 XA40 | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,550 mm14 ft 11 in14 ft 11 in4,550 mm | 4,570 mm15 ft 0 in15 ft 0 in4,570 mm | −20 mm−0.8 in −0.4% |
| Width | 1,750 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,750 mm | 1,845 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,845 mm | −95 mm−4 in −5.1% |
| Height | 1,670 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,670 mm | 1,670 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,670 mm | Same |
| Wheelbase | 2,625 mm8 ft 7 in8 ft 7 in2,625 mm | 2,660 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,660 mm | −35 mm−1 in −1.3% |
| Footprint | 7.96 m²85.7 sq ft85.7 sq ft7.96 m² | 8.43 m²90.8 sq ft90.8 sq ft8.43 m² | −0.47 m²−5.0 sq ft −5.6% |
| Boot | 402 L14.2 cu ft14.2 cu ft402 L | 506 L17.9 cu ft17.9 cu ft506 L | −104 L−3.7 cu ft −20.6% |
| Kerb weight | 1,515 kg3,340 lb3,340 lb1,515 kg | 1,610 kg3,549 lb3,549 lb1,610 kg | −95 kg−209 lb −5.9% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Outlander CU
- Single garage
- Fits 950 mm3 ft 1 in to spare in length, 625 mm2 ft 1 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 450 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 375 mm1 ft 3 in each side
RAV4 XA40
- Single garage
- Tight 930 mm3 ft 1 in to spare in length, 578 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 430 mm1 ft 5 in to spare in length, 328 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Mitsubishi Outlander CU or the Toyota RAV4 XA40?
The Toyota RAV4 XA40 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Outlander CU is 20 mm shorter, 95 mm narrower and the same height than the RAV4 XA40. Its wheelbase is 35 mm shorter.
Will the Mitsubishi Outlander CU and the Toyota RAV4 XA40 fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mitsubishi Outlander CU fits with room to open the doors (950 mm to spare in length, 625 mm each side). The Toyota RAV4 XA40 fits, but it is tight to get out (930 mm to spare in length, 578 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Toyota RAV4 XA40: 506 L against 402 L in the Mitsubishi Outlander CU (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.