Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Nissan X-Trail T33 vs MG HS II: size comparison

  • Length X-Trail T33 10 mm0.4 in longer
  • Width HS II 50 mm2 in wider
  • Height X-Trail T33 57 mm2 in taller
  • Boot X-Trail T33 53 L1.9 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

X-Trail T33 Nissan · 2020–present · SUV X-Trail T33 4,680 × 1,840 × 1,720 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 8 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

HS II MG · 2024–present · SUV HS II 4,670 × 1,890 × 1,663 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 2 in × 5 ft 5 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: X-Trail T33
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: HS II
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,680 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,720 mm5 ft 8 inWheelbase 2,765 mmWheelbase 9 ft 1 inLength 4,670 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,663 mm5 ft 5 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The X-Trail T33 is 10 mm0.4 in longer, 50 mm2 in narrower and 57 mm2 in taller than the HS II. Its wheelbase is 60 mm2 in shorter.

DimensionX-Trail T33HS IIDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,680 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,680 mm4,670 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,670 mm +10 mm+0.4 in +0.2%
Width1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm1,890 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,890 mm −50 mm−2 in −2.6%
Height1,720 mm5 ft 8 in5 ft 8 in1,720 mm1,663 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,663 mm +57 mm+2 in +3.4%
Wheelbase2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm2,765 mm9 ft 1 in9 ft 1 in2,765 mm −60 mm−2 in −2.2%
Footprint8.61 m²92.7 sq ft92.7 sq ft8.61 m²8.83 m²95.0 sq ft95.0 sq ft8.83 m² −0.22 m²−2.3 sq ft −2.4%
Boot560 L19.8 cu ft19.8 cu ft560 L507 L17.9 cu ft17.9 cu ft507 L +53 L+1.9 cu ft +10.5%
Kerb weight1,664–1,924 kg3,668–4,242 lb3,668–4,242 lb1,664–1,924 kg1,735–1,905 kg3,825–4,200 lb3,825–4,200 lb1,735–1,905 kg −71 kg−157 lb −4.1%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

X-Trail T33

Single garage
Tight 820 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 320 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side

HS II

Single garage
Tight 830 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 555 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 330 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 305 mm1 ft 0 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Nissan X-Trail T33 or the MG HS II?

The MG HS II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The X-Trail T33 is 10 mm longer, 50 mm narrower and 57 mm taller than the HS II. Its wheelbase is 60 mm shorter.

Will the Nissan X-Trail T33 and the MG HS II fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Nissan X-Trail T33 fits, but it is tight to get out (820 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). The MG HS II fits, but it is tight to get out (830 mm to spare in length, 555 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Nissan X-Trail T33: 560 L against 507 L in the MG HS II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error