Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

MG HS II vs Nissan X-Trail T33: size comparison

  • Length X-Trail T33 10 mm0.4 in longer
  • Width HS II 50 mm2 in wider
  • Height X-Trail T33 57 mm2 in taller
  • Boot X-Trail T33 53 L1.9 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

HS II MG · 2024–present · SUV HS II 4,670 × 1,890 × 1,663 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 2 in × 5 ft 5 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

X-Trail T33 Nissan · 2020–present · SUV X-Trail T33 4,680 × 1,840 × 1,720 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 8 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: HS II
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: X-Trail T33
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,765 mmWheelbase 9 ft 1 inLength 4,670 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,663 mm5 ft 5 inWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,680 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,720 mm5 ft 8 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The HS II is 10 mm0.4 in shorter, 50 mm2 in wider and 57 mm2 in lower than the X-Trail T33. Its wheelbase is 60 mm2 in longer.

DimensionHS IIX-Trail T33Difference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,670 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,670 mm4,680 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,680 mm −10 mm−0.4 in −0.2%
Width1,890 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,890 mm1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm +50 mm+2 in +2.7%
Height1,663 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,663 mm1,720 mm5 ft 8 in5 ft 8 in1,720 mm −57 mm−2 in −3.3%
Wheelbase2,765 mm9 ft 1 in9 ft 1 in2,765 mm2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm +60 mm+2 in +2.2%
Footprint8.83 m²95.0 sq ft95.0 sq ft8.83 m²8.61 m²92.7 sq ft92.7 sq ft8.61 m² +0.22 m²+2.3 sq ft +2.5%
Boot507 L17.9 cu ft17.9 cu ft507 L560 L19.8 cu ft19.8 cu ft560 L −53 L−1.9 cu ft −9.5%
Kerb weight1,735–1,905 kg3,825–4,200 lb3,825–4,200 lb1,735–1,905 kg1,664–1,924 kg3,668–4,242 lb3,668–4,242 lb1,664–1,924 kg +71 kg+157 lb +4.3%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

HS II

Single garage
Tight 830 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 555 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 330 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 305 mm1 ft 0 in each side

X-Trail T33

Single garage
Tight 820 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 320 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the MG HS II or the Nissan X-Trail T33?

The MG HS II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The HS II is 10 mm shorter, 50 mm wider and 57 mm lower than the X-Trail T33. Its wheelbase is 60 mm longer.

Will the MG HS II and the Nissan X-Trail T33 fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The MG HS II fits, but it is tight to get out (830 mm to spare in length, 555 mm each side). The Nissan X-Trail T33 fits, but it is tight to get out (820 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Nissan X-Trail T33: 560 L against 507 L in the MG HS II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error