Size comparison · drawn to scale
Mazda CX-60 KH vs Jaguar F-Pace X761: size comparison
- Length About the same length
- Width F-Pace X761 181 mm7 in wider
- Height CX-60 KH 18 mm0.7 in taller
- Boot CX-60 KH 62 L2.2 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The CX-60 KH is 2 mm0.1 in shorter, 181 mm7 in narrower and 18 mm0.7 in taller than the F-Pace X761. Its wheelbase is 4 mm0.2 in shorter.
| Dimension | CX-60 KH | F-Pace X761 | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,745 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,745 mm | 4,747 mm15 ft 7 in15 ft 7 in4,747 mm | −2 mm−0.1 in |
| Width | 1,890 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,890 mm | 2,071 mm6 ft 10 in6 ft 10 in2,071 mm | −181 mm−7 in −8.7% |
| Height | 1,682 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,682 mm | 1,664 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,664 mm | +18 mm+0.7 in +1.1% |
| Wheelbase | 2,870 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,870 mm | 2,874 mm9 ft 5 in9 ft 5 in2,874 mm | −4 mm−0.2 in −0.1% |
| Footprint | 8.97 m²96.5 sq ft96.5 sq ft8.97 m² | 9.83 m²105.8 sq ft105.8 sq ft9.83 m² | −0.86 m²−9.3 sq ft −8.8% |
| Boot | 570 L20.1 cu ft20.1 cu ft570 L | 508 L17.9 cu ft17.9 cu ft508 L | +62 L+2.2 cu ft +12.2% |
| Kerb weight | 1,890–2,055 kg4,167–4,530 lb4,167–4,530 lb1,890–2,055 kg | 1,991 kg4,389 lb4,389 lb1,991 kg | −101 kg−223 lb −5.1% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
CX-60 KH
- Single garage
- Tight 755 mm2 ft 6 in to spare in length, 555 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 255 mm10 in to spare in length, 305 mm1 ft 0 in each side
F-Pace X761
- Single garage
- Tight 753 mm2 ft 6 in to spare in length, 465 mm1 ft 6 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 253 mm10 in to spare in length, 215 mm8 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Mazda CX-60 KH or the Jaguar F-Pace X761?
The Jaguar F-Pace X761 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The CX-60 KH is 2 mm shorter, 181 mm narrower and 18 mm taller than the F-Pace X761. Its wheelbase is 4 mm shorter.
Will the Mazda CX-60 KH and the Jaguar F-Pace X761 fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mazda CX-60 KH fits, but it is tight to get out (755 mm to spare in length, 555 mm each side). The Jaguar F-Pace X761 fits, but it is tight to get out (753 mm to spare in length, 465 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mazda CX-60 KH: 570 L against 508 L in the Jaguar F-Pace X761 (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.
