Size comparison · drawn to scale
Chevrolet Camaro VI vs Bentley Continental GT II: size comparison
- Length Continental GT II 23 mm0.9 in longer
- Width Continental GT II 47 mm2 in wider
- Height Continental GT II 55 mm2 in taller
- Boot Continental GT II 100 L3.5 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Camaro VI is 23 mm0.9 in shorter, 47 mm2 in narrower and 55 mm2 in lower than the Continental GT II. Its wheelbase is 66 mm3 in longer.
| Dimension | Camaro VI | Continental GT II | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,783 mm15 ft 8 in15 ft 8 in4,783 mm | 4,806 mm15 ft 9 in15 ft 9 in4,806 mm | −23 mm−0.9 in −0.5% |
| Width | 1,897 mm6 ft 3 in6 ft 3 in1,897 mm | 1,944 mm6 ft 5 in6 ft 5 in1,944 mm | −47 mm−2 in −2.4% |
| Height | 1,349 mm4 ft 5 in4 ft 5 in1,349 mm | 1,404 mm4 ft 7 in4 ft 7 in1,404 mm | −55 mm−2 in −3.9% |
| Wheelbase | 2,812 mm9 ft 3 in9 ft 3 in2,812 mm | 2,746 mm9 ft 0 in9 ft 0 in2,746 mm | +66 mm+3 in +2.4% |
| Footprint | 9.07 m²97.7 sq ft97.7 sq ft9.07 m² | 9.34 m²100.6 sq ft100.6 sq ft9.34 m² | −0.27 m²−2.9 sq ft −2.9% |
| Boot | 258 L9.1 cu ft9.1 cu ft258 L | 358 L12.6 cu ft12.6 cu ft358 L | −100 L−3.5 cu ft −27.9% |
| Kerb weight | 1,539 kg3,393 lb3,393 lb1,539 kg | 2,320 kg5,115 lb5,115 lb2,320 kg | −781 kg−1,722 lb −33.7% |
| Price new (EUR) | from about €40,400 (2016) | from about €188,972 (2011) | −€148,572 −78.6% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. New prices are list prices in EUR entered by our editors, with the year.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Camaro VI
- Single garage
- Tight 717 mm2 ft 4 in to spare in length, 552 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 217 mm9 in to spare in length, 302 mm1 ft 0 in each side
Continental GT II
- Single garage
- Tight 694 mm2 ft 3 in to spare in length, 528 mm1 ft 9 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 194 mm8 in to spare in length, 278 mm11 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Chevrolet Camaro VI or the Bentley Continental GT II?
The Bentley Continental GT II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Camaro VI is 23 mm shorter, 47 mm narrower and 55 mm lower than the Continental GT II. Its wheelbase is 66 mm longer.
Will the Chevrolet Camaro VI and the Bentley Continental GT II fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Chevrolet Camaro VI fits, but it is tight to get out (717 mm to spare in length, 552 mm each side). The Bentley Continental GT II fits, but it is tight to get out (694 mm to spare in length, 528 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Bentley Continental GT II: 358 L against 258 L in the Chevrolet Camaro VI (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.