Size comparison · drawn to scale
Volvo XC90 II vs Audi Q7 4M: size comparison
- Length Q7 4M 100 mm4 in longer
- Width Q7 4M 47 mm2 in wider
- Height XC90 II 34 mm1 in taller
- Boot Q7 4M 277 L9.8 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:23 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The XC90 II is 100 mm4 in shorter, 47 mm2 in narrower and 34 mm1 in taller than the Q7 4M. Its wheelbase is 10 mm0.4 in shorter.
| Dimension | XC90 II | Q7 4M | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,950 mm16 ft 3 in16 ft 3 in4,950 mm | 5,050 mm16 ft 7 in16 ft 7 in5,050 mm | −100 mm−4 in −2.0% |
| Width | 1,923 mm6 ft 4 in6 ft 4 in1,923 mm | 1,970 mm6 ft 6 in6 ft 6 in1,970 mm | −47 mm−2 in −2.4% |
| Height | 1,775 mm5 ft 10 in5 ft 10 in1,775 mm | 1,741 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,741 mm | +34 mm+1 in +2.0% |
| Wheelbase | 2,984 mm9 ft 9 in9 ft 9 in2,984 mm | 2,994 mm9 ft 10 in9 ft 10 in2,994 mm | −10 mm−0.4 in −0.3% |
| Footprint | 9.52 m²102.5 sq ft102.5 sq ft9.52 m² | 9.95 m²107.1 sq ft107.1 sq ft9.95 m² | −0.43 m²−4.6 sq ft −4.3% |
| Boot | 613 L21.6 cu ft21.6 cu ft613 L | 890 L31.4 cu ft31.4 cu ft890 L | −277 L−9.8 cu ft −31.1% |
| Kerb weight | 1,998–2,170 kg4,405–4,784 lb4,405–4,784 lb1,998–2,170 kg | Not in our catalog yet | - |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
XC90 II
- Single garage
- Tight 550 mm1 ft 10 in to spare in length, 539 mm1 ft 9 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 50 mm2 in to spare in length, 289 mm11 in each side
Q7 4M
- Single garage
- Tight 450 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 515 mm1 ft 8 in each side
- Parking bay
- Does not fit 50 mm2 in too long
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Volvo XC90 II or the Audi Q7 4M?
The Audi Q7 4M is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The XC90 II is 100 mm shorter, 47 mm narrower and 34 mm taller than the Q7 4M. Its wheelbase is 10 mm shorter.
Will the Volvo XC90 II and the Audi Q7 4M fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Volvo XC90 II fits, but it is tight to get out (550 mm to spare in length, 539 mm each side). The Audi Q7 4M fits, but it is tight to get out (450 mm to spare in length, 515 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q7 4M: 890 L against 613 L in the Volvo XC90 II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.