Kia Ceed I vs Ford Focus II: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Kia · 2006–2012
Ceed I
- Power
- 105 kW143 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Calreyn88 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Ford · 2004–2011
Focus II
- Power
- 66 kW90 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,272 kg
Photo: Cutlass / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Ceed I 1 Focus II 1
- Family Focus II Boot: 526 l vs 340 l
- City Ceed I Length: 4,235 mm vs 4,488 mm; Width: 1,790 mm vs 1,840 mm
In plain words
Kia Ceed I has more power: 105 kW (143 PS) against 66 kW (90 PS) for Ford Focus II. Ford Focus II is 253 mm longer than Kia Ceed I (4,488 mm vs 4,235 mm). Ford Focus II has the bigger boot: 526 l against 340 l. Ford Focus II is the older design (from 2004); Kia Ceed I arrived in 2006. On the catalog figures, the Ford Focus II is the pick for family; the Kia Ceed I is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Kia Ceed I yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Ceed I | Focus II | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,235 mm166.7 in † | 4,488 mm176.7 in +253 mm +10.0 in +6.0% |
| Width | 1,790 mm70.5 in † | 1,840 mm72.4 in +50 mm +2.0 in +2.8% |
| Height | 1,480 mm58.3 in † | 1,497 mm58.9 in +17 mm +0.7 in +1.1% |
| Wheelbase | 2,650 mm104.3 in † | 2,640 mm103.9 in −10 mm −0.4 in −0.4% |
| Boot | 340 l12.0 cu ft † | 526 l18.6 cu ft +186 l +6.6 cu ft +54.7% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Ceed I (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Kia Ceed I | Ford Focus II | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 (143 PS) · petrol · 105 kW (143 PS) | 2.0 · 66 kW (90 PS) |
| Production years | 2006–2012 | 2004–2011 |
| Body | Hatchback, Station wagon | Hatchback, Station wagon |
| Country | South Korea | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 105 kW (143 PS) 141 hp Better | 66 kW (90 PS) 89 hp |
| Power, all versions | 66–105 kW (90–143 PS) 89–141 hp | 66–257 kW (90–349 PS) 89–345 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 52 kW/t 63 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | No data |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | 2,000 cc 2.0 l |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,235 mm 166.7 in † | 4,488 mm 176.7 in |
| Width | 1,790 mm 70.5 in † | 1,840 mm 72.4 in |
| Height | 1,480 mm 58.3 in † | 1,497 mm 58.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650 mm 104.3 in † | 2,640 mm 103.9 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,272 kg 2,804 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 340 l 12.0 cu ft † | 526 l 18.6 cu ft Better |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2007) | ★★★★★ (2004) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Engine.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.