Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Hyundai Tucson JM vs Nissan X-Trail T30: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Hyundai Tucson JM

Hyundai · 2004–2009

Tucson JM

C PI 463

Power
129 kW175 PS
0–100 km/h
10.5 s
Top speed
180 km/h
Kerb mass
1,668 kg

Version spec sheet

Photo: RL GNZLZ / Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0
Nissan X-Trail T30

Nissan · 2000–2007

X-Trail T30

Power
100 kW136 PS
0–100 km/h
-
Top speed
-
Kerb mass
-

All generations

Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Tucson JM 1 X-Trail T30 2

  • Family Tucson JM Boot: 540 l vs 410 l
  • City Too close to call Length: 4,325 mm vs 4,510 mm
  • Running costs X-Trail T30 Fuel per year: €2,280 vs €2,630 (estimated)
  • Off-road X-Trail T30 Drive and body: Four-wheel drive (4×4) · SUV vs All-wheel drive · SUV

In plain words

Hyundai Tucson JM has more power: 129 kW (175 PS) against 100 kW (136 PS) for Nissan X-Trail T30. Nissan X-Trail T30 is 185 mm longer than Hyundai Tucson JM (4,510 mm vs 4,325 mm). Hyundai Tucson JM has the bigger boot: 540 l against 410 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €2,630 (Hyundai Tucson JM), €2,280 (Nissan X-Trail T30) (estimated). Nissan X-Trail T30 is the older design (from 2000); Hyundai Tucson JM arrived in 2004. On the catalog figures, the Hyundai Tucson JM is the pick for family; the Nissan X-Trail T30 is the pick for running costs and off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Nissan X-Trail T30 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Size and weight

Tucson JMX-Trail T30
Length 4,325 mm170.3 in † 4,510 mm177.6 in +185 mm +7.3 in +4.3%
Width 1,795 mm70.7 in † 1,765 mm69.5 in −30 mm −1.2 in −1.7%
Wheelbase 2,630 mm103.5 in † 2,625 mm103.3 in −5 mm −0.2 in −0.2%
Boot 540 l19.1 cu ft 410 l14.5 cu ft −130 l −4.6 cu ft −24.1%
Fits a standard garage? YesYes

Difference vs Tucson JM (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.

Full specifications

Hyundai Tucson JMNissan X-Trail T30
General
Version 2.7 · petrol · 129 kW (175 PS) 2.2 dCi diesel · 100 kW (136 PS)
Production years 2004–2009 2000–2007
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country South Korea Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 129 kW (175 PS) 173 hp Better 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp
Power, all versions 104–129 kW (141–175 PS) 139–173 hp 84–206 kW (114–280 PS) 113–276 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. No data 314 Nm 232 lb-ft
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 10.5 s No data
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. 180 km/h 112 mph No data
Power per tonne 77 kW/t 94 hp/ton calculated No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Diesel
Engine 2,700 cc · 6 cyl 2.7 l No data
Gearbox No data 6-speed manual
Drive All-wheel drive Four-wheel drive (4×4)
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,325 mm 170.3 in † 4,510 mm 177.6 in
Width 1,795 mm 70.7 in † 1,765 mm 69.5 in
Height 1,730 mm 68.1 in † No data
Wheelbase 2,630 mm 103.5 in † 2,625 mm 103.3 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 1,668 kg 3,677 lb No data
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 540 l 19.1 cu ft Better 410 l 14.5 cu ft
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. 65 l 17.2 gal US No data
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. 10.0 l/100 km 23.5 mpg US 9.2 l/100 km 25.6 mpg US Better
CO₂ 237 g/km No data
Fuel cost per year €2,630/year estimated €2,280/year estimated Better
Range on a full tank 650 km 404 mi estimated No data
Safety
Euro NCAP ★★★★☆ (2006) ★★★★☆ (2002)

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol, €1.65/l diesel. † from another version of this generation.

Photo credits