Kia Optima vs Toyota Camry XV70: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Kia · 2015–2020
Optima
- Power
- 180 kW245 PS

Toyota · 2017–2024
Camry XV70
- Power
- 155 kW211 PS
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,845 mm vs 4,880 mm
In plain words
Kia Optima has more power: 180 kW (245 PS) against 155 kW (211 PS) for Toyota Camry XV70. Toyota Camry XV70 is 35 mm longer than Kia Optima (4,880 mm vs 4,845 mm). Kia Optima is the older design (from 2015); Toyota Camry XV70 arrived in 2017.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Optima | Camry XV70 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,845 mm190.7 in | 4,880 mm192.1 in +35 mm +1.4 in +0.7% |
| Width | 1,860 mm73.2 in | 1,840 mm72.4 in −20 mm −0.8 in −1.1% |
| Height | 1,455 mm57.3 in | 1,445 mm56.9 in −10 mm −0.4 in −0.7% |
| Wheelbase | 2,805 mm110.4 in | 2,820 mm111.0 in +15 mm +0.6 in +0.5% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | Tight |
Difference vs Optima (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Kia Optima | Toyota Camry XV70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · 180 kW (245 PS) | 2.5 Hybrid · 155 kW (211 PS) |
| Production years | 2015–2020 | 2017–2024 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | South Korea | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 180 kW (245 PS) 241 hp Better | 155 kW (211 PS) 208 hp |
| Power, all versions | 100–180 kW (136–245 PS) 134–241 hp | 155–224 kW (211–305 PS) 208–300 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Hybrid |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | 2,487 cc · 4 cyl 2.5 l |
| Gearbox | automatic | CVT |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,845 mm 190.7 in | 4,880 mm 192.1 in |
| Width | 1,860 mm 73.2 in | 1,840 mm 72.4 in |
| Height | 1,455 mm 57.3 in | 1,445 mm 56.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,805 mm 110.4 in | 2,820 mm 111.0 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 505 l 17.8 cu ft | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2015) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).