SsangYong Kyron vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
SsangYong · 2005–2011
Kyron
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
Mitsubishi · 1996–2010
Pajero Sport I
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 71–139 kW97–189 PS
Photo: OSX / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain
In plain words
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is the older design (from 1996); SsangYong Kyron arrived in 2005.
Full specifications
| SsangYong Kyron | Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.3 · petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2005–2011 | 1996–2010 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | South Korea | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp | 71–139 kW (97–189 PS) 95–186 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 104–110 kW (141–150 PS) 139–148 hp | 71–139 kW (97–189 PS) 95–186 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | No data |
| Engine | 2,300 cc 2.3 l | No data |
| Gearbox | manual | No data |
| Drive | No data | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,660 mm 183.5 in † | No data |
| Width | 1,880 mm 74.0 in † | No data |
| Height | 1,755 mm 69.1 in † | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,740 mm 107.9 in † | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 620 l 21.9 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 75 l 19.8 gal US | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.