Lada XRay vs Lifan X50: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Lada · 2015–2022
XRay
- Power
- 84 kW114 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
Lifan · 2014–2020
X50
- Power
- 76 kW103 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.0 s
- Top speed
- 160 km/h
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: XRay 0 X50 2
- Family X50 Boot: 570 l vs 376 l
- City X50 Width: 1,722 mm vs 1,765 mm
In plain words
Lada XRay has more power: 84 kW (114 PS) against 76 kW (103 PS) for Lifan X50. Lada XRay is 65 mm longer than Lifan X50 (4,165 mm vs 4,100 mm). Lifan X50 has the bigger boot: 570 l against 376 l. Lifan X50 is the older design (from 2014); Lada XRay arrived in 2015. On the catalog figures, the Lifan X50 is the pick for family and city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Lada XRay yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| XRay | X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,165 mm164.0 in | 4,100 mm161.4 in −65 mm −2.6 in −1.6% |
| Width | 1,765 mm69.5 in | 1,722 mm67.8 in −43 mm −1.7 in −2.4% |
| Height | 1,572 mm61.9 in | 1,540 mm60.6 in −32 mm −1.3 in −2.0% |
| Boot | 376 l13.3 cu ft | 570 l20.1 cu ft +194 l +6.9 cu ft +51.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs XRay (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Lada XRay | Lifan X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · 84 kW (114 PS) | 1.5 · petrol · 76 kW (103 PS) |
| Production years | 2015–2022 | 2014–2020 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | No data | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 84 kW (114 PS) 113 hp Better | 76 kW (103 PS) 102 hp |
| Power, all versions | 78–90 kW (106–122 PS) 105–121 hp | 69–76 kW (94–103 PS) 93–102 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 11.0 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 160 km/h 99 mph |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 1,500 cc 1.5 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,165 mm 164.0 in | 4,100 mm 161.4 in |
| Width | 1,765 mm 69.5 in | 1,722 mm 67.8 in |
| Height | 1,572 mm 61.9 in | 1,540 mm 60.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,593 mm 102.1 in | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 376 l 13.3 cu ft | 570 l 20.1 cu ft Better |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 6.5 l/100 km 36.2 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,710/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.