Lada VAZ-2110 vs Opel Astra G: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Lada · 1995–2007
VAZ-2110
- Power
- 52 kW71 PS
Photo: Dmitry Terekhov / Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0
Opel · 1998–2004
Astra G
- Power
- 108 kW147 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: VAZ-2110 1 Astra G 1
- Family VAZ-2110 Boot: 416 l vs 370 l
- City Astra G Length: 4,110 mm vs 4,265 mm
In plain words
Opel Astra G has more power: 108 kW (147 PS) against 52 kW (71 PS) for Lada VAZ-2110. Lada VAZ-2110 is 155 mm longer than Opel Astra G (4,265 mm vs 4,110 mm). Lada VAZ-2110 has the bigger boot: 416 l against 370 l. Lada VAZ-2110 is the older design (from 1995); Opel Astra G arrived in 1998. On the catalog figures, the Lada VAZ-2110 is the pick for family; the Opel Astra G is the pick for city.
Size and weight
| VAZ-2110 | Astra G | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,265 mm167.9 in | 4,110 mm161.8 in −155 mm −6.1 in −3.6% |
| Boot | 416 l14.7 cu ft | 370 l13.1 cu ft −46 l −1.6 cu ft −11.1% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs VAZ-2110 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Lada VAZ-2110 | Opel Astra G | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.5 · 52 kW (71 PS) | 2.2 · petrol · 108 kW (147 PS) |
| Production years | 1995–2007 | 1998–2004 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan, Hatchback |
| Country | No data | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 52 kW (71 PS) 70 hp | 108 kW (147 PS) 145 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 52–67 kW (71–91 PS) 70–90 hp | 48–147 kW (65–200 PS) 64–197 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,500 cc 1.5 l | 2,200 cc · 4 cyl 2.2 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,265 mm 167.9 in | 4,110 mm 161.8 in |
| Width | No data | 1,709 mm 67.3 in |
| Height | No data | 1,425 mm 56.1 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,606 mm 102.6 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 416 l 14.7 cu ft Better | 370 l 13.1 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 7.5 l/100 km 31.4 mpg US | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,970/year estimated | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.