Mitsubishi ASX I vs Opel Mokka: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Mitsubishi · 2010–2024
ASX I
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
Photo: Rutger van der Maar / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

Opel · 2012–2019
Mokka
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
Photo: Jhonny89 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: ASX I 1 Mokka 0
- Family ASX I Boot: 415 l vs 356 l
- City Too close to call Length: 4,295 mm vs 4,278 mm
In plain words
Mitsubishi ASX I has more power: 110 kW (150 PS) against 103 kW (140 PS) for Opel Mokka. Mitsubishi ASX I is 17 mm longer than Opel Mokka (4,295 mm vs 4,278 mm). Mitsubishi ASX I has the bigger boot: 415 l against 356 l. Mitsubishi ASX I is the older design (from 2010); Opel Mokka arrived in 2012. On the catalog figures, the Mitsubishi ASX I is the pick for family.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| ASX I | Mokka | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,295 mm169.1 in | 4,278 mm168.4 in −17 mm −0.7 in −0.4% |
| Width | 1,770 mm69.7 in | 1,777 mm70.0 in +7 mm +0.3 in +0.4% |
| Height | 1,625 mm64.0 in | 1,646 mm64.8 in +21 mm +0.8 in +1.3% |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm105.1 in | 2,555 mm100.6 in −115 mm −4.5 in −4.3% |
| Boot | 415 l14.7 cu ft | 356 l12.6 cu ft −59 l −2.1 cu ft −14.2% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs ASX I (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Mitsubishi ASX I | Opel Mokka | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · 110 kW (150 PS) | 1.8 · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) |
| Production years | 2010–2024 | 2012–2019 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp Better | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp |
| Power, all versions | 86–110 kW (117–150 PS) 115–148 hp | 81–112 kW (110–152 PS) 109–150 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | 1,800 cc 1.8 l |
| Drive | No data | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,295 mm 169.1 in | 4,278 mm 168.4 in |
| Width | 1,770 mm 69.7 in | 1,777 mm 70.0 in |
| Height | 1,625 mm 64.0 in | 1,646 mm 64.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm 105.1 in | 2,555 mm 100.6 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 415 l 14.7 cu ft Better | 356 l 12.6 cu ft |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2011) | ★★★★★ (2012) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).