Kia Niro SG2 vs Nissan Kicks P16: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Kia · 2022–present
Niro SG2
- Power
- 150 kW204 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 7.8 s
- Top speed
- 167 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,739 kg
Nissan · 2024–present
Kicks P16
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 88–155 kW120–211 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Elise240SX / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Niro SG2 Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · Crossover
In plain words
Kia Niro SG2 is the older design (from 2022); Nissan Kicks P16 arrived in 2024. On the catalog figures, the Kia Niro SG2 is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Nissan Kicks P16 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Kia Niro SG2 | Nissan Kicks P16 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | EV 64.8 kWh · electric · 150 kW (204 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2022–present | 2024–present |
| Body | SUV | Crossover |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | South Korea | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 150 kW (204 PS) 201 hp | 88–155 kW (120–211 PS) 118–208 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 104–150 kW (141–204 PS) 139–201 hp | 88–155 kW (120–211 PS) 118–208 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 255 Nm 188 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 7.8 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 167 km/h 104 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 86 kW/t 105 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Electric | No data |
| Gearbox | single-speed | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,420 mm 174.0 in † | No data |
| Width | 1,825 mm 71.9 in † | No data |
| Height | 1,545 mm 60.8 in † | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 451 l 15.9 cu ft † | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 42 l 11.1 gal US † | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel cost per year | €870/year estimated | No data |
| Electric | ||
| Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully. | 65 kWh | No data |
| Electric range Why it matters: A longer range means fewer charging stops on long journeys. | 463 km 288 mi | No data |
| Energy use | 19.4 kWh/100 km | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★☆ (2022) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Class, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €0.30/kWh electricity. † from another version of this generation.