Ford Mondeo CD391 vs Toyota Camry XV70: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Ford · 2014–2022
Mondeo CD391
- Power
- 146 kW199 PS
Photo: Rudolf Stricker / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Toyota · 2017–2024
Camry XV70
- Power
- 155 kW211 PS
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,872 mm vs 4,880 mm
In plain words
Toyota Camry XV70 has more power: 155 kW (211 PS) against 146 kW (199 PS) for Ford Mondeo CD391. Toyota Camry XV70 is 8 mm longer than Ford Mondeo CD391 (4,880 mm vs 4,872 mm). Ford Mondeo CD391 is the older design (from 2014); Toyota Camry XV70 arrived in 2017.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Mondeo CD391 | Camry XV70 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,872 mm191.8 in | 4,880 mm192.1 in +8 mm +0.3 in +0.2% |
| Height | 1,478 mm58.2 in | 1,445 mm56.9 in −33 mm −1.3 in −2.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,850 mm112.2 in | 2,820 mm111.0 in −30 mm −1.2 in −1.1% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Tight |
Difference vs Mondeo CD391 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Ford Mondeo CD391 | Toyota Camry XV70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · 146 kW (199 PS) | 2.5 Hybrid · 155 kW (211 PS) |
| Production years | 2014–2022 | 2017–2024 |
| Body | Liftback, Sedan | Sedan |
| Country | United States | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 146 kW (199 PS) 196 hp | 155 kW (211 PS) 208 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 84–177 kW (114–241 PS) 113–237 hp | 155–224 kW (211–305 PS) 208–300 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | 2,487 cc · 4 cyl 2.5 l |
| Gearbox | No data | CVT |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,872 mm 191.8 in | 4,880 mm 192.1 in |
| Width | No data | 1,840 mm 72.4 in |
| Height | 1,478 mm 58.2 in | 1,445 mm 56.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850 mm 112.2 in | 2,820 mm 111.0 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 429 l 15.2 cu ft | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2019) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).