Nissan X-Trail T31 vs Kia Sportage JE: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Nissan · 2007–2013
X-Trail T31
- Power
- 127 kW173 PS

Kia · 2004–2010
Sportage JE
- Power
- 83 kW113 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Sportage JE Length: 4,350 mm vs 4,636 mm
In plain words
Nissan X-Trail T31 has more power: 127 kW (173 PS) against 83 kW (113 PS) for Kia Sportage JE. Nissan X-Trail T31 is 286 mm longer than Kia Sportage JE (4,636 mm vs 4,350 mm). Kia Sportage JE is the older design (from 2004); Nissan X-Trail T31 arrived in 2007. On the catalog figures, the Kia Sportage JE is the pick for city.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| X-Trail T31 | Sportage JE | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,636 mm182.5 in | 4,350 mm171.3 in −286 mm −11.3 in −6.2% |
| Width | 1,790 mm70.5 in | 1,840 mm72.4 in +50 mm +2.0 in +2.8% |
| Height | 1,700 mm66.9 in | 1,730 mm68.1 in +30 mm +1.2 in +1.8% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs X-Trail T31 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Nissan X-Trail T31 | Kia Sportage JE | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 dCi diesel · 127 kW (173 PS) | 2.0 · diesel · 83 kW (113 PS) |
| Production years | 2007–2013 | 2004–2010 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 127 kW (173 PS) 170 hp Better | 83 kW (113 PS) 111 hp |
| Power, all versions | 104–127 kW (141–173 PS) 139–170 hp | 83–129 kW (113–175 PS) 111–173 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Diesel |
| Engine | 1,995 cc 2.0 l | 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,636 mm 182.5 in | 4,350 mm 171.3 in |
| Width | 1,790 mm 70.5 in | 1,840 mm 72.4 in |
| Height | 1,700 mm 66.9 in | 1,730 mm 68.1 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,630 mm 103.5 in |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 7.4 l/100 km 31.8 mpg US | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★☆ (2007) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).