Opel Mokka vs Mitsubishi ASX I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Opel · 2012–2019
Mokka
- Power
- 96 kW131 PS
Photo: Jhonny89 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Mitsubishi · 2010–2024
ASX I
- Power
- 86 kW117 PS
Photo: Rutger van der Maar / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Mokka 0 ASX I 1
- Family ASX I Boot: 415 l vs 356 l
- City Too close to call Length: 4,278 mm vs 4,295 mm
In plain words
Opel Mokka has more power: 96 kW (131 PS) against 86 kW (117 PS) for Mitsubishi ASX I. Mitsubishi ASX I is 17 mm longer than Opel Mokka (4,295 mm vs 4,278 mm). Mitsubishi ASX I has the bigger boot: 415 l against 356 l. Mitsubishi ASX I is the older design (from 2010); Opel Mokka arrived in 2012. On the catalog figures, the Mitsubishi ASX I is the pick for family.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Mokka | ASX I | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,278 mm168.4 in | 4,295 mm169.1 in +17 mm +0.7 in +0.4% |
| Width | 1,777 mm70.0 in | 1,770 mm69.7 in −7 mm −0.3 in −0.4% |
| Height | 1,646 mm64.8 in | 1,625 mm64.0 in −21 mm −0.8 in −1.3% |
| Wheelbase | 2,555 mm100.6 in | 2,670 mm105.1 in +115 mm +4.5 in +4.5% |
| Boot | 356 l12.6 cu ft | 415 l14.7 cu ft +59 l +2.1 cu ft +16.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Mokka (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Opel Mokka | Mitsubishi ASX I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 96 kW (131 PS) | 1.6 · 86 kW (117 PS) |
| Production years | 2012–2019 | 2010–2024 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Germany | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 96 kW (131 PS) 129 hp Better | 86 kW (117 PS) 115 hp |
| Power, all versions | 81–112 kW (110–152 PS) 109–150 hp | 86–110 kW (117–150 PS) 115–148 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,600 cc 1.6 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 5-speed |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,278 mm 168.4 in | 4,295 mm 169.1 in |
| Width | 1,777 mm 70.0 in | 1,770 mm 69.7 in |
| Height | 1,646 mm 64.8 in | 1,625 mm 64.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,555 mm 100.6 in | 2,670 mm 105.1 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 356 l 12.6 cu ft | 415 l 14.7 cu ft Better |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2012) | ★★★★★ (2011) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).