Chevrolet Camaro II vs Plymouth Barracuda III: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Chevrolet · 1970–1981
Camaro II
- Power
- 116 kW158 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,501 kg
Plymouth · 1970–1974
Barracuda III
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 93–317 kW126–431 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Greg Gjerdingen from Willmar, USA / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
In plain words
Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Plymouth Barracuda III yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Chevrolet Camaro II | Plymouth Barracuda III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 250 straight-six · 116 kW (158 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 1970–1981 | 1970–1974 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe, Convertible |
| Class | Sports car | Sports car |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 116 kW (158 PS) 156 hp | 93–317 kW (126–431 PS) 125–425 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 89–280 kW (121–381 PS) 119–375 hp | 93–317 kW (126–431 PS) 125–425 hp |
| Power per tonne | 77 kW/t 94 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 4,100 cc · 6 cyl 4.1 l | No data |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,775 mm 188.0 in | No data |
| Width | 1,890 mm 74.4 in | No data |
| Height | 1,273 mm 50.1 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm 108.0 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,501 kg 3,309 lb | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).