Opel Antara vs SsangYong Kyron: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Opel · 2006–2015
Antara
- Power
- 123 kW167 PS
Photo: Jhonny89 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
SsangYong · 2005–2011
Kyron
- Power
- 104 kW141 PS
Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Antara 1 Kyron 1
- Family Kyron Boot: 620 l vs 420 l
- City Antara Width: 1,850 mm vs 1,880 mm
In plain words
Opel Antara has more power: 123 kW (167 PS) against 104 kW (141 PS) for SsangYong Kyron. SsangYong Kyron is 64 mm longer than Opel Antara (4,660 mm vs 4,596 mm). SsangYong Kyron has the bigger boot: 620 l against 420 l. SsangYong Kyron is the older design (from 2005); Opel Antara arrived in 2006. On the catalog figures, the SsangYong Kyron is the pick for family; the Opel Antara is the pick for city.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Antara | Kyron | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,596 mm180.9 in | 4,660 mm183.5 in +64 mm +2.5 in +1.4% |
| Width | 1,850 mm72.8 in | 1,880 mm74.0 in +30 mm +1.2 in +1.6% |
| Height | 1,761 mm69.3 in | 1,755 mm69.1 in −6 mm −0.2 in −0.3% |
| Wheelbase | 2,707 mm106.6 in | 2,740 mm107.9 in +33 mm +1.3 in +1.2% |
| Boot | 420 l14.8 cu ft | 620 l21.9 cu ft +200 l +7.1 cu ft +47.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Tight |
Difference vs Antara (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Opel Antara | SsangYong Kyron | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.4 · petrol · 123 kW (167 PS) | diesel · 104 kW (141 PS) |
| Production years | 2006–2015 | 2005–2011 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Germany | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 123 kW (167 PS) 165 hp Better | 104 kW (141 PS) 139 hp |
| Power, all versions | 103–183 kW (140–249 PS) 138–245 hp | 104–110 kW (141–150 PS) 139–148 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Diesel |
| Engine | 2,400 cc 2.4 l | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,596 mm 180.9 in | 4,660 mm 183.5 in |
| Width | 1,850 mm 72.8 in | 1,880 mm 74.0 in |
| Height | 1,761 mm 69.3 in | 1,755 mm 69.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,707 mm 106.6 in | 2,740 mm 107.9 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 420 l 14.8 cu ft | 620 l 21.9 cu ft Better |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 75 l 19.8 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).