Chevrolet Camaro I vs Chevrolet Camaro IV: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Chevrolet · 1966–1969
Camaro I
- Power
- 216 kW294 PS

Chevrolet · 1993–2002
Camaro IV
- Power
- 205 kW279 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Camaro I Length: 4,691 mm vs 4,907 mm; Width: 1,842 mm vs 1,882 mm
In plain words
Chevrolet Camaro I has more power: 216 kW (294 PS) against 205 kW (279 PS) for Chevrolet Camaro IV. Chevrolet Camaro IV is 216 mm longer than Chevrolet Camaro I (4,907 mm vs 4,691 mm). Chevrolet Camaro I is the older design (from 1966); Chevrolet Camaro IV arrived in 1993. On the catalog figures, the Chevrolet Camaro I is the pick for city.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Camaro I | Camaro IV | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,691 mm184.7 in | 4,907 mm193.2 in +216 mm +8.5 in +4.6% |
| Width | 1,842 mm72.5 in | 1,882 mm74.1 in +40 mm +1.6 in +2.2% |
| Height | 1,306 mm51.4 in | 1,303 mm51.3 in −3 mm −0.1 in −0.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm108.0 in | 2,568 mm101.1 in −175 mm −6.9 in −6.4% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Tight |
Difference vs Camaro I (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Chevrolet Camaro I | Chevrolet Camaro IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | Z/28 302 (290 hp gross) · 216 kW (294 PS) | 5.7 L (350 cu in) V8 · 205 kW (279 PS) |
| Production years | 1966–1969 | 1993–2002 |
| Body | Coupe, Convertible | Coupe, Convertible |
| Class | Sports car | Sports car |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 216 kW (294 PS) 290 hp Better | 205 kW (279 PS) 275 hp |
| Power, all versions | 104–321 kW (141–436 PS) 139–430 hp | 119–246 kW (162–334 PS) 160–330 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 4,900 cc · 8 cyl 4.9 l | 8 cyl |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,691 mm 184.7 in | 4,907 mm 193.2 in |
| Width | 1,842 mm 72.5 in | 1,882 mm 74.1 in |
| Height | 1,306 mm 51.4 in | 1,303 mm 51.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm 108.0 in | 2,568 mm 101.1 in |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 64 l 16.9 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (5): Body, Class, Country, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).