Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Mazda CX-60 KH vs Mazda CX-80 KL: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Mazda CX-60 KH

Mazda · 2022–present

CX-60 KH

C PI 461

Power
147 kW200 PS
0–100 km/h
8.4 s
Top speed
212 km/h
Kerb mass
1,890 kg

Version spec sheet

Mazda CX-80 KL

Mazda · 2024–present

CX-80 KL

C PI 475

Power
187 kW254 PS
0–100 km/h
8.4 s
Top speed
219 km/h
Kerb mass
2,152 kg

Version spec sheet

Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: CX-60 KH 3 CX-80 KL 2

  • Family CX-60 KH Boot: 570 l vs 258 l
  • City CX-60 KH Length: 4,745 mm vs 4,995 mm; Consumption: 5.1 l/100 km vs 5.7 l/100 km
  • Performance CX-80 KL Power per tonne: 87 kW/t vs 78 kW/t
  • Running costs CX-60 KH Fuel per year: €1,260 vs €1,410 (estimated)
  • Off-road CX-80 KL Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Rear-wheel drive · SUV

In plain words

Mazda CX-80 KL has more power: 187 kW (254 PS) against 147 kW (200 PS) for Mazda CX-60 KH. Mazda CX-80 KL is 250 mm longer than Mazda CX-60 KH (4,995 mm vs 4,745 mm). Mazda CX-60 KH is lighter by 262 kg (1,890 kg vs 2,152 kg). Mazda CX-60 KH has the bigger boot: 570 l against 258 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,260 (Mazda CX-60 KH), €1,410 (Mazda CX-80 KL) (estimated). Mazda CX-60 KH is the older design (from 2022); Mazda CX-80 KL arrived in 2024. On the catalog figures, the Mazda CX-60 KH is the pick for family, city and running costs; the Mazda CX-80 KL is the pick for performance and off-road.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
StatCX-60 KHCX-80 KL
PIC · 461C · 475
Power 42 46
Grip 30 40
Handling 45 34
Top speed 43 46
Launch 40 40

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

  1. 1 CX-80 KL3.3 e-Skyactiv D 254 AWD · diesel · 187 kW (254 PS) 15.90 sat 136 km/h
  2. 2 CX-60 KH3.3 e-Skyactiv D 200 · diesel · 147 kW (200 PS) 16.05 sat 138 km/h · +0.15 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

CX-60 KH · CX-80 KL
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,870 mmWheelbase 9 ft 5 inLength 4,745 mmLength 15 ft 7 in1,682 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 3,120 mmWheelbase 10 ft 3 inLength 4,995 mmLength 16 ft 5 in1,710 mm5 ft 7 in
CX-60 KHCX-80 KL
Length 4,745 mm186.8 in 4,995 mm196.7 in +250 mm +9.8 in +5.3%
Width 1,890 mm74.4 in 1,890 mm74.4 in
Height 1,682 mm66.2 in 1,710 mm67.3 in +28 mm +1.1 in +1.7%
Wheelbase 2,870 mm113.0 in 3,120 mm122.8 in +250 mm +9.8 in +8.7%
Kerb weight 1,890 kg4,167 lb 2,152 kg4,744 lb +262 kg +578 lb +13.9%
Boot 570 l20.1 cu ft 258 l9.1 cu ft −312 l −11.0 cu ft −54.7%
Fits a standard garage? TightTight

Difference vs CX-60 KH (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

Mazda CX-60 KHMazda CX-80 KL
General
Version 3.3 e-Skyactiv D 200 · diesel · 147 kW (200 PS) 3.3 e-Skyactiv D 254 AWD · diesel · 187 kW (254 PS)
Production years 2022–present 2024–present
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country Japan Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 147 kW (200 PS) 197 hp 187 kW (254 PS) 251 hp Better
Power, all versions 138–241 kW (188–328 PS) 185–323 hp 187–241 kW (254–328 PS) 251–323 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. 450 Nm 332 lb-ft 550 Nm 406 lb-ft Better
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 8.4 s 8.4 s
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. 212 km/h 132 mph 219 km/h 136 mph Better
Power per tonne 78 kW/t 95 hp/ton calculated 87 kW/t 106 hp/ton calculated Better
Engine and transmission
Fuel Diesel Diesel
Engine 3,283 cc · 6 cyl 3.3 l 6 cyl
Gearbox 8-speed automatic 8-speed automatic
Drive Rear-wheel drive All-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,745 mm 186.8 in 4,995 mm 196.7 in
Width 1,890 mm 74.4 in 1,890 mm 74.4 in
Height 1,682 mm 66.2 in 1,710 mm 67.3 in
Wheelbase 2,870 mm 113.0 in 3,120 mm 122.8 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 1,890 kg 4,167 lb Better 2,152 kg 4,744 lb
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 570 l 20.1 cu ft Better 258 l 9.1 cu ft
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. 58 l 15.3 gal US No data
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. 5.1 l/100 km 46.1 mpg US Better 5.7 l/100 km 41.3 mpg US
CO₂ 132 g/km Better 148 g/km
Fuel cost per year €1,260/year estimated Better €1,410/year estimated
Range on a full tank 1,137 km 706 mi estimated No data
Safety
Euro NCAP ★★★★★ (2022) ★★★★★ (2024)

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.