Fiat 600 F364 vs Jeep Avenger I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Fiat · 2023–present
600 F364
- Power
- 81 kW110 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 10.5 s
- Top speed
- 184 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,355 kg
Jeep · 2023–present
Avenger I
- Power
- 81 kW110 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 10.4 s
- Top speed
- 184 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,288 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: 600 F364 0 Avenger I 3
- Family Too close to call Boot: 385 l vs 380 l
- City Avenger I Length: 4,084 mm vs 4,178 mm
- Long trips Too close to call Range: 917 km vs 898 km (estimated)
- Performance Avenger I Power per tonne: 63 kW/t vs 60 kW/t
- Running costs Too close to call Fuel per year: €1,260 vs €1,290 (estimated)
- Off-road Avenger I Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · Crossover
In plain words
Jeep Avenger I is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 10.4 s against 10.5 s for Fiat 600 F364. Fiat 600 F364 is 94 mm longer than Jeep Avenger I (4,178 mm vs 4,084 mm). Jeep Avenger I is lighter by 67 kg (1,288 kg vs 1,355 kg). Fiat 600 F364 has the bigger boot: 385 l against 380 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,260 (Fiat 600 F364), €1,290 (Jeep Avenger I) (estimated). On the catalog figures, the Jeep Avenger I is the pick for city, performance and off-road.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | 600 F364 | Avenger I |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 454 | C · 450 |
| Power | 34 | 36 |
| Grip | 39 | 35 |
| Handling | 64 | 62 |
| Top speed | 32 | 32 |
| Launch | 30 | 30 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Avenger I1.2 e-Hybrid · 81 kW (110 PS) 17.33 sat 126 km/h
- 2 600 F3641.2 T3 Hybrid DCT 110 · 81 kW (110 PS) 17.38 sat 125 km/h · +0.05 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| 600 F364 | Avenger I | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,178 mm164.5 in | 4,084 mm160.8 in −94 mm −3.7 in −2.2% |
| Width | 1,779 mm70.0 in | 1,776 mm69.9 in −3 mm −0.1 in −0.2% |
| Height | 1,525 mm60.0 in | 1,536 mm60.5 in +11 mm +0.4 in +0.7% |
| Wheelbase | 2,557 mm100.7 in | 2,557 mm100.7 in |
| Kerb weight | 1,355 kg2,987 lb | 1,288 kg2,840 lb −67 kg −148 lb −4.9% |
| Boot | 385 l13.6 cu ft | 380 l13.4 cu ft −5 l −0.2 cu ft −1.3% |
| Fuel tank | 44 l11.6 gal US | 44 l11.6 gal US |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs 600 F364 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Fiat 600 F364 | Jeep Avenger I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.2 T3 Hybrid DCT 110 · 81 kW (110 PS) | 1.2 e-Hybrid · 81 kW (110 PS) |
| Production years | 2023–present | 2023–present |
| Body | Crossover | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Italy | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 81 kW (110 PS) 109 hp | 81 kW (110 PS) 109 hp |
| Power, all versions | 74–206 kW (101–280 PS) 99–276 hp | 74–115 kW (101–156 PS) 99–154 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 184 km/h 114 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
| Power per tonne | 60 kW/t 73 hp/ton calculated | 63 kW/t 77 hp/ton calculated Better |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Engine | 1,199 cc · 3 cyl 1.2 l | 3 cyl |
| Gearbox | 6-speed dual-clutch | 6-speed dual-clutch |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,178 mm 164.5 in | 4,084 mm 160.8 in |
| Width | 1,779 mm 70.0 in | 1,776 mm 69.9 in |
| Height | 1,525 mm 60.0 in | 1,536 mm 60.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,557 mm 100.7 in | 2,557 mm 100.7 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,288 kg 2,840 lb Better |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 385 l 13.6 cu ft | 380 l 13.4 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 44 l 11.6 gal US | 44 l 11.6 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 4.8 l/100 km 49.0 mpg US | 4.9 l/100 km 48.0 mpg US |
| CO₂ | 109 g/km | 110 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,260/year estimated | €1,290/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | 917 km 570 mi estimated | 898 km 558 mi estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★☆☆ (2024) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (10): Production years, Class, Power, Torque, Top speed, Fuel, Gearbox, Drive, Wheelbase, Fuel tank.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.