Mitsubishi ASX vs Opel Mokka: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Mitsubishi · 2010–2024
ASX I
- Power
- 86 kW117 PS

Opel · 2012–2019
Mokka
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: ASX I 1 Mokka 0
- Family ASX I Boot: 415 l vs 356 l
- City Too close to call Length: 4,295 mm vs 4,278 mm
In plain words
Opel Mokka has more power: 103 kW (140 PS) against 86 kW (117 PS) for Mitsubishi ASX. Mitsubishi ASX is 17 mm longer than Opel Mokka (4,295 mm vs 4,278 mm). Mitsubishi ASX has the bigger boot: 415 l against 356 l. Mitsubishi ASX is the older design (from 2010); Opel Mokka arrived in 2012. On the catalog figures, the Mitsubishi ASX is the pick for family.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| ASX I | Mokka | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,295 mm169.1 in | 4,278 mm168.4 in −17 mm −0.7 in −0.4% |
| Width | 1,770 mm69.7 in | 1,777 mm70.0 in +7 mm +0.3 in +0.4% |
| Height | 1,625 mm64.0 in | 1,646 mm64.8 in +21 mm +0.8 in +1.3% |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm105.1 in | 2,555 mm100.6 in −115 mm −4.5 in −4.3% |
| Boot | 415 l14.7 cu ft | 356 l12.6 cu ft −59 l −2.1 cu ft −14.2% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs ASX I (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Mitsubishi ASX | Opel Mokka | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · 86 kW (117 PS) | 1.8 · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) |
| Production years | 2010–2024 | 2012–2019 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 86 kW (117 PS) 115 hp | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 86–110 kW (117–150 PS) 115–148 hp | 81–112 kW (110–152 PS) 109–150 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 1,800 cc 1.8 l |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | No data |
| Drive | No data | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,295 mm 169.1 in | 4,278 mm 168.4 in |
| Width | 1,770 mm 69.7 in | 1,777 mm 70.0 in |
| Height | 1,625 mm 64.0 in | 1,646 mm 64.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm 105.1 in | 2,555 mm 100.6 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 415 l 14.7 cu ft Better | 356 l 12.6 cu ft |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2011) | ★★★★★ (2012) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).