Ford Mondeo vs Toyota Camry: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Ford · 2014–2022
Mondeo CD391
- Power
- 177 kW241 PS

Toyota · 2023–present
Camry XV80
- Power
- 168 kW228 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,872 mm vs 4,885 mm
In plain words
Ford Mondeo has more power: 177 kW (241 PS) against 168 kW (228 PS) for Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry is 13 mm longer than Ford Mondeo (4,885 mm vs 4,872 mm). Toyota Camry is the older design (from 1982); Ford Mondeo arrived in 1992.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Mondeo CD391 | Camry XV80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,872 mm191.8 in | 4,885 mm192.3 in +13 mm +0.5 in +0.3% |
| Height | 1,478 mm58.2 in | 1,445 mm56.9 in −33 mm −1.3 in −2.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,850 mm112.2 in | 2,825 mm111.2 in −25 mm −1.0 in −0.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Tight |
Difference vs Mondeo CD391 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Ford Mondeo | Toyota Camry | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · 177 kW (241 PS) | Camry XV80 · 2.5 Hybrid FWD · 168 kW (228 PS) |
| Production years | 2014–2022 | 2023–present |
| Body | Sedan, Liftback | Sedan |
| Country | United States | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp Better | 168 kW (228 PS) 225 hp |
| Power, all versions | 84–177 kW (114–241 PS) 113–237 hp | 107–224 kW (145–305 PS) 143–300 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | 2,487 cc · 4 cyl 2.5 l |
| Gearbox | No data | CVT |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,872 mm 191.8 in | 4,885 mm 192.3 in |
| Width | No data | 1,840 mm 72.4 in |
| Height | 1,478 mm 58.2 in | 1,445 mm 56.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850 mm 112.2 in | 2,825 mm 111.2 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 429 l 15.2 cu ft | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2019) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).