Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Lamborghini Urus vs Porsche Cayenne GTS: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Lamborghini Urus

Lamborghini · 2018–present

Urus

A PI 706

Power
478 kW650 PS
0–100 km/h
3.6 s
Top speed
-
Kerb mass
2,200 kg

Porsche Cayenne GTS

Porsche · 2012–2018

Cayenne GTS (E2, 958)

A PI 653

Power
309 kW420 PS
0–100 km/h
5.2 s
Top speed
262 km/h
Kerb mass
-

Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Urus 2 Cayenne GTS (E2, 958) 0

  • Performance Urus 0–100 km/h: 3.6 s vs 5.2 s
  • Off-road Urus Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs All-wheel drive · SUV

In plain words

Lamborghini Urus is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 3.6 s against 5.2 s for Porsche Cayenne GTS. Porsche Cayenne GTS is the older design (from 2008); Lamborghini Urus arrived in 2018. On the catalog figures, the Lamborghini Urus is the pick for performance and off-road. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Porsche Cayenne GTS yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
StatUrusCayenne GTS (E2, 958)
PIA · 706A · 653
Power 74 66
Grip 66 52
Handling 36 62
Top speed 79 62
Launch 79 62

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

  1. 1 Urus478 kW (650 PS) 11.70 sat 195 km/h
  2. 2 Cayenne GTS (E2, 958)4.8 · petrol · 309 kW (420 PS) 13.25 sat 186 km/h · +1.55 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Full specifications

Lamborghini UrusPorsche Cayenne GTS
General
Version 478 kW (650 PS) 4.8 · petrol · 309 kW (420 PS)
Production years 2018–present 2012–2018
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country Italy Germany
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 478 kW (650 PS) 641 hp Better 309 kW (420 PS) 414 hp
Power, all versions 478–588 kW (650–799 PS) 641–789 hp 298–368 kW (405–500 PS) 400–493 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. 850 Nm 627 lb-ft No data
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 3.6 s Better 5.2 s
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. No data 262 km/h 163 mph
Power per tonne 217 kW/t 264 hp/ton calculated No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel No data Petrol
Engine No data 4,800 cc · 8 cyl 4.8 l
Drive All-wheel drive All-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 5,113 mm 201.3 in No data
Width 2,017 mm 79.4 in No data
Height 1,638 mm 64.5 in No data
Wheelbase 3,002 mm 118.2 in No data
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 2,200 kg 4,850 lb No data
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. No data 10.0 l/100 km 23.5 mpg US
Fuel cost per year No data €2,630/year estimated

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.