Toyota Camry vs Ford Mondeo: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Toyota · 2023–present
Camry XV80
- Power
- 168 kW228 PS

Ford · 2014–2022
Mondeo CD391
- Power
- 177 kW241 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Too close to call Length: 4,885 mm vs 4,872 mm
In plain words
Ford Mondeo has more power: 177 kW (241 PS) against 168 kW (228 PS) for Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry is 13 mm longer than Ford Mondeo (4,885 mm vs 4,872 mm). Toyota Camry is the older design (from 1982); Ford Mondeo arrived in 1992.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Camry XV80 | Mondeo CD391 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,885 mm192.3 in | 4,872 mm191.8 in −13 mm −0.5 in −0.3% |
| Height | 1,445 mm56.9 in | 1,478 mm58.2 in +33 mm +1.3 in +2.3% |
| Wheelbase | 2,825 mm111.2 in | 2,850 mm112.2 in +25 mm +1.0 in +0.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | No data |
Difference vs Camry XV80 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Toyota Camry | Ford Mondeo | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | Camry XV80 · 2.5 Hybrid FWD · 168 kW (228 PS) | 2.0 · 177 kW (241 PS) |
| Production years | 2023–present | 2014–2022 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan, Liftback |
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 168 kW (228 PS) 225 hp | 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 107–224 kW (145–305 PS) 143–300 hp | 84–177 kW (114–241 PS) 113–237 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Hybrid | Diesel |
| Engine | 2,487 cc · 4 cyl 2.5 l | 2,000 cc 2.0 l |
| Gearbox | CVT | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,885 mm 192.3 in | 4,872 mm 191.8 in |
| Width | 1,840 mm 72.4 in | No data |
| Height | 1,445 mm 56.9 in | 1,478 mm 58.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,825 mm 111.2 in | 2,850 mm 112.2 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 429 l 15.2 cu ft |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★★ (2019) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).