SsangYong Rexton W vs UAZ Patriot: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
SsangYong · 2012–2017
Rexton W
- Power
- 137 kW186 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.3 s
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
UAZ · 2016–present
Patriot
- Power
- 84–110 kW114–150 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- 150 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 2,125 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Rexton W Width: 1,900 mm vs 2,110 mm
In plain words
SsangYong Rexton W is 5 mm longer than UAZ Patriot (4,755 mm vs 4,750 mm). SsangYong Rexton W is the older design (from 2012); UAZ Patriot arrived in 2014. UAZ Patriot is still in production; SsangYong Rexton W is not. On the catalog figures, the SsangYong Rexton W is the pick for city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the UAZ Patriot yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Rexton W | Patriot | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,755 mm187.2 in | 4,750 mm187.0 in −5 mm −0.2 in −0.1% |
| Width | 1,900 mm74.8 in | 2,110 mm83.1 in +210 mm +8.3 in +11.1% |
| Height | 1,840 mm72.4 in | 1,910 mm75.2 in +70 mm +2.8 in +3.8% |
| Wheelbase | 2,835 mm111.6 in | 2,760 mm108.7 in −75 mm −3.0 in −2.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | Too wide |
Difference vs Rexton W (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| SsangYong Rexton W | UAZ Patriot | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 137 kW (186 PS) | 2016–present · 2.7 · petrol |
| Production years | 2012–2017 | 2016–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | South Korea | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 137 kW (186 PS) 184 hp Better | 84–110 kW (114–150 PS) 113–148 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 217 Nm 160 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 11.3 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 150 km/h 93 mph |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 2,700 cc 2.7 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 5-speed manual |
| Drive | No data | Four-wheel drive (4×4) |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,755 mm 187.2 in | 4,750 mm 187.0 in |
| Width | 1,900 mm 74.8 in | 2,110 mm 83.1 in |
| Height | 1,840 mm 72.4 in | 1,910 mm 75.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835 mm 111.6 in | 2,760 mm 108.7 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 2,125 kg 4,685 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 700 l 24.7 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 68 l 18.0 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 7.6 l/100 km 30.9 mpg US | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,880/year estimated | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.