Haima 7 vs Brilliance V5: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Haima · 2010–2020
7
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- 1,500 kg

Brilliance · 2011–2020
V5
- Power
- 81 kW110 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 13.9 s
- Top speed
- 165 km/h
- Kerb mass
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: 7 2 V5 0
- City 7 Length: 4,421 mm vs 4,620 mm; Width: 1,830 mm vs 1,922 mm
- Running costs 7 Fuel per year: €2,130 vs €2,630 (estimated)
In plain words
Haima 7 has more power: 110 kW (150 PS) against 81 kW (110 PS) for Brilliance V5. Brilliance V5 is 199 mm longer than Haima 7 (4,620 mm vs 4,421 mm). At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €2,130 (Haima 7), €2,630 (Brilliance V5) (estimated). Haima 7 is the older design (from 2010); Brilliance V5 arrived in 2011. On the catalog figures, the Haima 7 is the pick for city and running costs. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Haima 7 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | 7 | V5 |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 454 | D · 376 |
| Power | 40 | 24 |
| Grip | 32 | 35 |
| Handling | 51 | 56 |
| Top speed | 34 | 25 |
| Launch | 38 | 17 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 7petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) 16.41 sat 134 km/h
- 2 V51.6 · 81 kW (110 PS) 18.83 sat 115 km/h · +2.42 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| 7 | V5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,421 mm174.1 in | 4,620 mm181.9 in +199 mm +7.8 in +4.5% |
| Width | 1,830 mm72.0 in | 1,922 mm75.7 in +92 mm +3.6 in +5.0% |
| Height | 1,740 mm68.5 in | 1,727 mm68.0 in −13 mm −0.5 in −0.7% |
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm103.1 in | 2,725 mm107.3 in +106 mm +4.2 in +4.0% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Too wide |
Difference vs 7 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Haima 7 | Brilliance V5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) | 1.6 · 81 kW (110 PS) |
| Production years | 2010–2020 | 2011–2020 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp Better | 81 kW (110 PS) 109 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 13.9 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 165 km/h 103 mph |
| Power per tonne | 73 kW/t 89 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,600 cc 1.6 l |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,421 mm 174.1 in | 4,620 mm 181.9 in |
| Width | 1,830 mm 72.0 in | 1,922 mm 75.7 in |
| Height | 1,740 mm 68.5 in | 1,727 mm 68.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm 103.1 in | 2,725 mm 107.3 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 430 l 15.2 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 8.1 l/100 km 29.0 mpg US Better | 10.0 l/100 km 23.5 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | €2,130/year estimated Better | €2,630/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.